njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1163-21 M.A.P., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … privacy. R. 1:38–3(d)(9) to (10). 3 A-1163-21 years. They have two children from the relationship: a son, J.G., was … out drinking. When plaintiff asked defendant, "Why do you have to drink so much," he threw the dinner plate in the …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1701-21 K.M.R., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Camden County, Docket No. … the oven door"; "stomped on [her]" to "basically make [her] have a miscarriage"; forced her at gunpoint to cook for him; …
njcourts.gov
… opposition is two-fold. First, plaintiffs contend the provision in N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b) permitting the Tax Court to … and payable for the year for which review is sought must have been paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Tax Court … the Sheriff’s sale on June 25, 2015, it should reasonably have known, in particular as a sophisticated commercial …
njcourts.gov
… Rule 4:6-2 provides: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: UNION COUNTY DOCKET NO. : UNN-L-536-19 CIVIL ACTION … or description." N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-313. Courts have noted that "whether a given statement constitutes an … asserts that defendants represented that the Walls have 100-year service life. For the purpose of this motion, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3121-17T1 RICHARD PRICE, … decision must clearly demonstrate that the litigants have been heard and their arguments considered. While a … married in July 2000, and divorced in November 2015. They have two unemancipated children. In their August 2015 …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2912-15T4 A-1126-16T1 A-3618-16T3 … in activities related to a security threat group. We have consolidated these three appeals for purposes of this … mail. N.J.A.C. 10A:4-9.7 states: (a) Hearings that have been postponed for further investigation shall be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1349-15T1 RIVA POINTE AT LINCOLN HARBOR … and futile to continue with the case given that we don't have a liability expert," because without an expert the … Rules, cmt. 2.2.3 on R. 2:2-3(a)(1) (2018). However, we have also considered the merits of the judge's dismissal of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2708-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … INJURY. (Not Raised Below). POINT II THE JURY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PERMITTED TO CONSIDER WHETHER [DEFENDANT] WAS … any alleged error 'unless it is of such a nature as to have been clearly capable of producing an unjust result.'" …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5302-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … by activity that would lead a reasonable police officer to have an articulable suspicion that criminal activity had …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … the name Ja Din Corp., and told the Dinkels they would also have to change "Monroe Electric" to "Munroe Electric." … by A-5427-10T2 13 plaintiff's argument, when, as we have explained, the violation of either statute, in and of …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … judge concluded as follows: In this case Citizens does not have to pay for the work of subcontractors. Subcontractors … working without pay. Additionally, a mortgagee does not have to notify anyone of a default before foreclosing. [S.D. …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1699-23 E.D.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … accurately recognized in his merits brief, "A judge may have to question a [self-represented] party to elicit necessary testimony." We have long recognized judges hearing domestic violence …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2402-23 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3507-22 J.S., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to defendant's email on May 7, 2023, stating: All neighbors have begun to put out their bulk garbage for pickup. I put … house, and . . . [plaintiff] did[ not] want [defendant] to have to pay for a dumpster when [the parties] sold the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2835-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … "we are left to conjecture as to what the judge may have had in mind." Salch v. Salch, 240 N.J. Super. 441, 443 … court also determined "it was reasonable" for Perialis to have brought the codicil to the court's attention. The court …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2278-23 SARA HUTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, … to produce documents and "presumably obtained or could have obtained all the information from him." A settlement … with the parties [MSA], Paragraph 4.8, those documents have been provided." The judge further reasoned that, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … the name Ja Din Corp., and told the Dinkels they would also have to change "Monroe Electric" to "Munroe Electric." … by A-5427-10T2 13 plaintiff's argument, when, as we have explained, the violation of either statute, in and of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1293-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … POINT I DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE HER SNAPCHAT POST WAS … Protected Free Speech, The Indictment Should Have Been Dismissed. 6 A-1293-19 B. Alternatively, Dismissal …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1417-20 PASHMAN STEIN WALDER HAYDEN, … replied that she was "limited to the $15,000" and would "have to let go" unless plaintiff agreed to charge no more … [her] any longer" in the appeal and the firm would have to initiate collection proceedings. Ackerman sent …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0664-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … interview of an eyewitness who told detectives K.B. did not have the right of way and did not use the crosswalk when she … 12 A-0664-20 III. Defendant argues the judge should have applied mitigating factor N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(b)(4) …