
Filters
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1602-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment No. 22-03-0370. Jennifer … hematoma" and opined that this injury was also unlikely to have been caused accidentally. On March 7, 2022, a grand …
- M.P. VS. N.P. (FV-12-1525-23, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1884-22 M.P.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protection. We affirm. I. The parties are married and have two minor children, K.P. and S.P. They lived … harassment. Ibid. (quoting H.E.S, 175 N.J. at 321). As we have previously addressed in the context of a domestic …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ZYMIRAH PRIESTER (21-02-0100, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1146-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … court's "opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … on the record and entitled to our deference. Therefore, we have no reason to disturb his conclusion that the totality …
- ASAP REALTY, INC. VS. YOSEF BIRNBOIM, ET AL. (L-4365-17, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2816-23 ASAP REALTY, INC., … In our August 2022 order, we noted that "[b]oth parties have expended more fees than each side had originally … over $100,000.00 of the judgment in its favor. Those monies have been paid through wage garnishment and bank levies. On …
- L.G. VS. J.B.M. (FV-16-1499-22, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1447-23 L.G.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and lived together for three years. They do not have children together. According to plaintiff, on an … long since ended. They do not reside together and do not have children in common. There is no evidence in the record …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0678-23 511 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINUM … in this matter" and asserted "a simple e[]mail would have sufficed." Defendant further contended his motion was … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case." …
- CAROL SAYERS VS. JACK GREENFIELD (FM-12-016017-81, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1995-23 CAROL SAYERS, … unexplained length of time . . . to do what in law should have been done." Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. … judgment in its November 17, 2023 order. For the reasons we have already set forth, the trial court's findings were …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2003-17T2 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND … I.S. took R.S. to her mother's, M.B.'s, home to visit and have dinner. Upon arriving at M.B.'s home, I.S. went into … DID NOT AND SHOULD NOT NOW BE PERMITTED TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE A FINDING THAT IS ADVERSE TO THEM, THIS IS GIVING THEM …
- M.N. VS. H.N. (FV-13-1282-18, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5443-17T3 M.N., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … acts should be considered 'regardless of whether those acts have been the subject of a domestic violence adjudication.'" … and legal conclusions are unassailable. To the extent we have not addressed H.N.'s remaining arguments, we find they …
- S.S. VS. M.J.C. (FV-02-0733-19, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2635-18T3 S.S., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … threaten the plaintiff; and (3) a reasonable person would have believed the threat." Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. Here, we … to disturb the award of counsel fees. To the extent we have not addressed defendant's remaining arguments, we find …
- SHARL M. GHOBRIAL VS. WAHID ELNASHFAN (DC-010038-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2150-18T4 SHARL M. GHOBRIAL, … an agreement pursuant to which he was to buy a house, have defendant renovate it, and pay defendant a portion of … did not present any new information that he could not have presented during the trial and which, in the interest …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1518-19 DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, … purchased the property. Defendant subsequently moved to have the judge vacate the sheriff's sale on July 31, 2019, … Fannie Mae transferred its rights or [BANA] purported to have acquired rights," and "someone else was to pay" the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2956-19 ERVIN MEARS, … right to know how tax monies are used." Ibid. As we have noted, defendant redacted every word of every line item … The trial court's contrary ruling was error. In sum, we have not found any line entries for services rendered or …
- J.R.R. VS. A.L.B. (FV-20-0036-21, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1909-20 J.R.R., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Union County, Docket No. FV-20-0036-21. … N.J. Super. 222, 229 (App. Div. 1999)). Defendant notes "we have previously expressed our concern that the Act may be …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CALVIN RIGGINS (18-09-1338, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0883-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to Judge Toto. Defendant argues: POINT I SUPPRESSION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE THE WARRANT AFFIDAVIT FAILED TO … was faulty and the evidence seized pursuant to it should have been suppressed. However, the warrant also specifically …
- njcourts.gov… a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning. Knowledge is a condition of the mind. … J.A., 337 N.J. Super. 114 (App. Div. 2001). The Appellate Division upheld the charge given by the trial court in that … a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning. Knowledge is a condition of the mind. …
- njcourts.gov… a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning. Knowledge is a condition of the mind. … J.A., 337 N.J. Super. 114 (App. Div. 2001). The Appellate Division upheld the charge given by the trial court in that … a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning. Knowledge is a condition of the mind. …
- M&T BANK, ETC. VS. RYUNG HEE CHO, ET AL. (F-017683-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5298-16T3 M&T BANK s/b/m HUDSON CITY … THE JUDGMENT. POINT V. DEFENDANTS IN FORECLOSURE ACTION HAVE A RIGHT TO CHALLENGE MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS [NOT RAISED … will be deemed uncontested if the responsive pleadings "have been stricken" or do not "contest the validity or …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-16T2 LOUIS BADUINI and JOEL … of PSE&G at the property. At one time, the property may have been considered wetlands, but it had been drained and … Super. 210, 234-35 (App. Div. 2008) (citation omitted). We have long recognized that "because of their peculiar …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0759-17T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … Brown. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP- 075-00. Patrick … has been given a conditional discharge and is alleged to have violated it." E.D., 183 N.J. at 551. In either case, …