njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5005-15T3 JASON MCGEE, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Ocean County, Docket No. C-000025-14. Darryl T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2995-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the findings of the Law Division "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … 146, 162 (1964). We need make no further inquiry. Ibid. We have considered defendant's remaining arguments in light of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0378-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … transaction. The judge held that the police did not have a "specific and articulable set of facts to rely upon … we conclude, as in Stovall and Zapata, the officer would have been derelict not to investigate the report of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0678-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and was the State's chief witness at trial. She claimed to have accepted the victim's invitation to meet for drinks. … his/her control thereof for a sufficient period of time to have been able to relinquish control if he/she chose to do …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5411-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … disturb the trial court's finding merely because 'it may have reached a different conclusion were it the trial …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5751-14T3 A-0192-15T4 STATE OF NEW … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Indictment No. 07-09-0124. NOT FOR … was also convicted of second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7. Defendants were sentenced in …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1921-15T1 A-3586-15T1 STATE OF NEW … Lisa. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Indictment Nos. 14-01-0034 … Graves Act parole disqualifier which, for Kaczur, would have been three years pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6c, and to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1518-19 DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, … purchased the property. Defendant subsequently moved to have the judge vacate the sheriff's sale on July 31, 2019, … Fannie Mae transferred its rights or [BANA] purported to have acquired rights," and "someone else was to pay" the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2956-19 ERVIN MEARS, … right to know how tax monies are used." Ibid. As we have noted, defendant redacted every word of every line item … The trial court's contrary ruling was error. In sum, we have not found any line entries for services rendered or …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1909-20 J.R.R., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Union County, Docket No. FV-20-0036-21. … N.J. Super. 222, 229 (App. Div. 1999)). Defendant notes "we have previously expressed our concern that the Act may be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2150-18T4 SHARL M. GHOBRIAL, … an agreement pursuant to which he was to buy a house, have defendant renovate it, and pay defendant a portion of … did not present any new information that he could not have presented during the trial and which, in the interest …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5298-16T3 M&T BANK s/b/m HUDSON CITY … THE JUDGMENT. POINT V. DEFENDANTS IN FORECLOSURE ACTION HAVE A RIGHT TO CHALLENGE MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS [NOT RAISED … will be deemed uncontested if the responsive pleadings "have been stricken" or do not "contest the validity or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0883-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to Judge Toto. Defendant argues: POINT I SUPPRESSION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE THE WARRANT AFFIDAVIT FAILED TO … was faulty and the evidence seized pursuant to it should have been suppressed. However, the warrant also specifically …
-
njcourts.gov
… 4 of 6 New Jersey Judiciary Superior Court - Appellate Division Criminal Case Information Statement (For use in … any issues below in this action involving defendant which have not been disposed of? (If so, leave to appeal must be … (19) I certify that confidential personal identifiers have been redacted from documents now submitted to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2995-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the findings of the Law Division "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … 146, 162 (1964). We need make no further inquiry. Ibid. We have considered defendant's remaining arguments in light of …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1602-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment No. 22-03-0370. Jennifer … hematoma" and opined that this injury was also unlikely to have been caused accidentally. On March 7, 2022, a grand …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0678-23 511 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINUM … in this matter" and asserted "a simple e[]mail would have sufficed." Defendant further contended his motion was … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case." …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1995-23 CAROL SAYERS, … unexplained length of time . . . to do what in law should have been done." Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. … judgment in its November 17, 2023 order. For the reasons we have already set forth, the trial court's findings were …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2003-17T2 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND … I.S. took R.S. to her mother's, M.B.'s, home to visit and have dinner. Upon arriving at M.B.'s home, I.S. went into … DID NOT AND SHOULD NOT NOW BE PERMITTED TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE A FINDING THAT IS ADVERSE TO THEM, THIS IS GIVING THEM …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-16T2 LOUIS BADUINI and JOEL … of PSE&G at the property. At one time, the property may have been considered wetlands, but it had been drained and … Super. 210, 234-35 (App. Div. 2008) (citation omitted). We have long recognized that "because of their peculiar …