-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4910-16T4 U.S. BANK CUSTODIAN/PFS … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … equitable that the judgment or order should 6 A-4910-16T4 have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2078-22 JOSEPH W. LANCASTER, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Monmouth County, Docket No. … to sell the trailer as the title owner, and therefore, we have no cause to disturb the judge's ruling. Defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3461-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE HER GUILTY PLEA SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON DE NOVO REVIEW PREDICATED UPON THE … to assuring that the criteria for a valid plea of guilty have been met."). [Gregory, 220 N.J. at 419-20.] 6 A-3461-22 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0839-23 MARIO D. LAWSON, Appellant, v. … re Arenas, 385 N.J. Super. 440, 443-44 (App. Div. 2006). We have also recognized that the Legislature has provided the … credible evidence in the record . To the extent we have not specifically addressed any of Lawson's other …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0472-21 ALTON NICHOLS, … adequacy" of plaintiff's expert report, the judge should have conducted an N.J.R.E. 104 hearing instead of dismissing … N.J. at 187. The treating physician's failure, however, to have considered plaintiff's decades-long history of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2128-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, Indictment No. 21-05-0213. Jennifer … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION-CRIMINAL PART ATLANTIC COUNTY vs. INDICTMENT NO. … Presiding Judge on September 25, 2025. The parties should have with them a copy of their witness lists, proposed voir … the Assistant Trial Court Administrator and the Criminal Division Manager to establish a plan with all concerned …
-
njcourts.gov
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION-CRIMINAL PART ATLANTIC COUNTY Plaintiff vs. … Presiding Judge on September 25, 2025. The parties should have with them a copy of their witness lists, proposed voir … the Assistant Trial Court Administrator and the Criminal Division Manager to establish a plan with all concerned …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2773-22 ROBERT RIVERA, … is fixed, unless exceptional circumstances are shown." We have identified four factors to consider when deciding … expert issues took place after fact depositions were to have been completed. The trial court noted correctly that …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOTICE TO THE BAR PUBLIC ACCESS IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION: (1) ORAL ARGUMENTS OF NON-PUBLIC CASES EXCEPTED FROM … Appellate Division Oral Arguments (CN: 12604) Individuals have long been able to request and obtain audio recordings … cases that are scheduled for oral argument, or cases that have been recently argued, go to this page: …
-
njcourts.gov
… 304 (2011) (quoting R. 4:46-5(a)). However, the parties have stipulated to the material facts. Lot 35.03 of Block … devoted to agricultural or horticultural use and to have been so devoted for at least the 2 successive years … Tax at 32. The longstanding policy of the Director of the Division of Taxation also does not require the filing of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1400-22 HIGHVIEW TERRACE APARTMENTS, … in a public housing unit and the judgment of possession may have residual legal consequences, his appeal is not moot. We … in denying defendant's motion. 7 A-1400-22 To the extent we have not addressed any of defendant's remaining arguments, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0044-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Legislature's 2020 amendment to N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(b)1 should have applied retroactively to defendant's sentence. The … amendment." Id. at 93. The Court noted that "[o]ur courts 'have long followed a general rule of statutory construction …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2045-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [In re … notice to all interested parties. [N.J.S.A. 55:13A-18.] We have previously acknowledged that the DCA is "without …
-
njcourts.gov
… RACHELLE L. HARZ J.6.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 291 MASTER DOCKET NO.: …
-
njcourts.gov
… and the city he led on the ground that the mayor should not have pursued his lawsuit against his city and the officials … were tainted by conflicts of interest when they agreed to have the city pay him a lot of money, $850,000, to settle. … on the property, but also probable zoning changes or subdivision. Irval Realty, Inc. v. Bd. Of Public Utilities …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0111-22 CHRISTINA LAPAGLIA, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Docket No. DC-003106-21. Ronald … N.J.S.A. 46:8-21.1). 7 A-0111-22 To the extent that we have not addressed Lapaglia's remaining arguments, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0172-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE HIS GUILTY PLEA SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON DE NOVO REVIEW PREDICATED UPON THE … ON MARCH 30, 2015 IN ACCORDANCE WITH R. 7:6-2(a)(1). We have considered this contention in light of the record, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3907-21 NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, … allowed hearsay evidence into the record. We have considered these contentions in light of the record and … the Board erroneously reached a conclusion that could not have been reasonably made based on the relevant facts. …
-
A-66-24 Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Kate Chieffo Supreme Court Docket No.: 090060 Appellate Division Docket No.: A-2319-22 Letter Brief of Plaintiffs, … two are not mutually exclusive. The Council is expected to have the expertise to make these determinations or the Legislature in its wisdom would not 'have delegated that decision to it by statute. The …