njcourts.gov
… CENTER, P.C., Plaintiff, vs. UNIDTED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY; OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC.; THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK … enlightening, see Rule 4:5-2, we agree with the Appellate Division’s finding that ‘[t]o the extent that plaintiff’s …
njcourts.gov
… COURT JEFF PAN, MD, PC, Plaintiff, vs. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION; ADP,LLC; and ABC … enlightening, see Rule 4:5-2, we agree with the Appellate Division’s finding that ‘[t]o the extent that plaintiff’s … they will only be responsible to pay the plan’s copayments, coinsurance and deductibles at an in-network level when …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … determined the State's interception of privileged marital communications between codefendant spouses Clarence D. Grant …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0047-21 POLINA ROITBURG, executor of … & LABORATORY SYSTEMS, and NATIONAL PRECISION TOOL COMPANY, INC., Defendants/Third-Party … Argued January 24, 2023 – Decided August 31, 2023 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0999-22 WILLIAM FULMORE, … Division order granting summary judgment dismissal of his complaint against defendants City of Englewood (City), City … to go to church," and "[you are] not allowed to have visitors." Plaintiff's account of the conversation with …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1795-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted September 19, 2024 – Decided October 15, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Natali and Vinci. On appeal from the … detailed in our unpublished opinion and in the PCR judge's comprehensive seventeen-page written decision. We …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0530-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued September 11, 2023 – Decided October 11, 2023 Before Judges Sabatino, Mawla and Chase. On appeal from the … RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL. POINT IV THE COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN PERMITTING THE LEAD …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0208-21 ADAM DIPAOLO, … Argued April 26, 2023 – Decided July 17, 2024 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia and Firko. On appeal from the … Education of the City of Newark (Board) and dismissing his complaint seeking vacatur of the award. Plaintiff claims the …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … expressed in these terms, the insanity statute codifies the common-law "M'Naghten" test dating back to …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0566-22 IN THE MATTER OF P.O. STEPHEN … Argued September 11, 2024 – Decided October 4, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Marczyk. On appeal from the New … police academy. During his time with the NJTPD, he received commendations and awards for his service. NJT is a public …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0096-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF NEW JERSEY- AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF INCREASE TARIFF RATES AND CHARGES FOR WATER …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2743-22 JAMES SPILLE and LORRAINE … C.R.N.A., KERRY RONAN, P.A., and BECTON DICKINSON & COMPANY, Defendants-Respondents. Argued November 7, 2024 – Decided January 3, 2025 Before Judges Currier, Paganelli, and Torregrossa- O'Connor. 1 …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2871-22 A-3945-22 A-3947-22 IN THE … 2018, C. 17 - ORDER GRANTING AN UP TO 12-MONTH EXTENSION FOR PROJECTS SEEKING AN INCENTIVE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (T) … with subsection (t) projects under the TI program pending completion of the PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM) process. …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3169-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued January 30, 2019 – Decided July 3, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz, Ostrer and Currier. On appeal from the … surprised to find Sylvia was not alone. Her son Xavier had come to help his parents and stood with his mother in the …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-3275-17T4 A-3382-17T4 STATE OF NEW … sentenced both defendants in accordance with the State's recommendations. Defendants now appeal from a June 17, 2016 … because the resident has given implicit consent to visitors to approach the home that way." State v. Domicz, …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3415-16T1 NORTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP … Petitioners-Appellants, v. KIMBERLY HARRINGTON, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF … Argued May 30, 2019 – Decided June 7, 2019 Before Judges Haas, Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0762-17T1 PETER D. CAMPANA and … Argued February 4, 2019 – Decided July 29, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … and an August 17, 2017 order, entering judgment on their complaint in lieu of prerogative writs in favor of their …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4349-15T3 RICHARD BARNASKAS and TERRI … from the May 6, 2016 Law Division order, dismissing their complaint with prejudice. In so doing, the trial court … the public portions of the building to avoid contact with visitors. Amelchenko explained that one of the accessory …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-0460-16T4 A-2535-16T4 STATE OF NEW … erroneously denied his motion for a mistrial because a comment by the State 's sole eyewitness was "wholly improper … it. Accordingly, we conclude Bouie 's sentence must be revisited on remand for an evaluation taking into account the …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5288-16T3 DONNALEE GILLEN, … from a June 23, 2017 order granting in part his motion to compel plaintiff Donnalee Gillen to contribute to their … the judge's findings as they relate to Gac need not be revisited. However, the parties have a material dispute …