Filters
- Notice – Attorneys Removed from the IOLTA Ineligible List Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… the Bar of New Jersey declares that the following attorneys have satisfied the requirement of R 1:28A:2(a) and their …
- Notice and Order - Resumption of Millville Municipal Court Operations Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… Questions can be directed to the Vicinage 15 Municipal Division Office at 856-878-5050 ext. 15290. /s/ Benjamin C. …
- njcourts.gov… Commission. The actions were transferred to the Appellate Division and consolidated. 2 The appellate court reversed the … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. 14 [In … the laws.” Defendants assert that county prosecutors have the authority to supersede municipal police …
- njcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … like that, and said, "Here, take it." She threw – she must have threw [sic] it at him, because it bounced, and it hit … casings recovered from Columbia Avenue were determined to have been fired from the handgun, confirming it was the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3136-16T2 IN THE MATTER OF MOTOR VEHICLE … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Ibid. … These laws must be "construed as 9 We pause to note that we have been presented with no proof of any "corruption" in …
- njcourts.gov… expanded statewide. As necessitated by the pandemic, the Division of Criminal Justice and all county prosecutors … in the success of CJR as they show whether individuals who have been released are appearing in court without having to … It is important to note that trial judges do not have independent authority to detain defendants pending …
- A-0492-11/A-1593-12 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … like that, and said, "Here, take it." She threw – she must have threw [sic] it at him, because it bounced, and it hit … casings recovered from Columbia Avenue were determined to have been fired from the handgun, confirming it was the …
- A-3136-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3136-16T2 IN THE MATTER OF MOTOR VEHICLE … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Ibid. … These laws must be "construed as 9 We pause to note that we have been presented with no proof of any "corruption" in …
- A-2570-22 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket No.: A-2570-22 IN THE MATTER OF DENIAL OF … actions requires that those challenging the decision have the burden of proving that the decision is reversible. … Procedure Act (“APA”) recognizes that “[p]ersons who have particularized property interests or who are directly …
- A-1054-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-001054-23 NFI REAL ESTATE, LLC AND … AMENDED ii III. DEFENDANT AND THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE APPLIED THE STANDARD ARTICULATED IN THE COVENTRY SQUARE … 2 in the adjoining municipality; presume that it would have denied a height variance if the building had been …
- A-2189-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-002189-23 NFI REAL ESTATE, LLC AND … the use of racking systems and other forms of automation, have required warehouses to “go up” with higher ceilings and … subject to certain conditions: Thus, our courts generally have treated a conditional use that does not comply with all …
- njcourts.gov… Commission. The actions were transferred to the Appellate Division and consolidated. 2 The appellate court reversed the … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. 14 [In … the laws.” Defendants assert that county prosecutors have the authority to supersede municipal police …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3418-21 A-3419-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE … AG Guidelines, § IV (emphasis added). But here, 8 We have previously held "the definition of 'assault firearm' is … interest. Additionally, we are persuaded the parties should have the opportunity to develop the necessary record to …
- Case Management Order #70 Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… .M'1• •:• SUPERIOR COURT~F NE'W' .H!«SEY CHELL& L. HA LAW DIVISION: BERG~&clUNIR, CASE NO. 291 MASTER DOCKET NO.: … cases that were filed prior to January 15, 2021, which have not settled with the non-J&J/Ethicon manufacturer and … include active cases filed prior to January 15, 2021 that have not settled with Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson directly or …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3418-21 A-3419-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE … AG Guidelines, § IV (emphasis added). But here, 8 We have previously held "the definition of 'assault firearm' is … interest. Additionally, we are persuaded the parties should have the opportunity to develop the necessary record to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5446-17T2 HADI PEZESHKI, … Mawla. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County, Docket No. DC-002459- 18. Hadi Pezeshki, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM This Landlord-Tenant …
- LAWRENCE JENKINS VS. QIANA M. BROWN-MORGAN (FD-20-1707-14, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4575-17T2 LAWRENCE JENKINS, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Union County, Docket No. FD-20-1707-14. … WEEKLY CHILD SUPPORT AND ARREARS THAT DEFENDANT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ENTITLED TO UNDER THE PROPER USE OF THE CHILD …
- Payments to the New Jersey Lawyers Fund for Client Protection Administrative Directivesnjcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives… #8-83 and #9-87, dealing with pro hac vice admissions have been combined. All redundant material has been deleted. …
- Payments to the New Jersey Lawyers Fund for Client Protection Administrative Directivesnjcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives… #8-83 and #9-87, dealing with pro hac vice admissions have been combined. All redundant material has been deleted. …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS ALVES (99-10-3250, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2944-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Koblitz. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 99-10-03250. Carlos … Although the State's argument is technically correct, we have opted to consider Judge Cifelli's December 24, 2015 …