-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4009-19 IN THE MATTER OF HARTZ MOUNTAIN … understand Rock Eagle's position that the remand should have been limited to the encroachment issue based on the … Permit, the majority of the Lincoln Harbor improvements have been constructed and are in service. The property is …
-
njcourts.gov
… entered judgment in favor of defendants. The Appellate Division affirmed, concluding that the four “exemptions listed … the BWCL. Second, it is not clear why the Legislature would have included the “notwithstanding” clause in subsection (l) … information potentially involving third parties, who also have a privacy right.” The letters appended a five-page list …
-
A-0595-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… TOBACCO COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant/Respondent. SUPERIOR COURT OF … Pa559. The Tax Court’s statement that Lorillard could have requested other than the 1 Though Defendant’s audit of … Ibid. The Tax Court's statement that Lorillard could have requested other than the Schedule G-2 limited amounts …
-
A-2905-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2905-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … charging Pearson with second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7b(1). (Da 8) … that a person is seized when “a reasonable person would have believed that he [or she] was not free to leave”). (1T …
-
A-3963-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… : : : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-003963-22 Civil Action ON APPEAL FROM … Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Appeal and the Plaintiff to have Someone Appointed by the Middlesex County Surrogate to … was treated surgically in an uncomplicated manner, she did have DVT that was treated with medication and in a follow-up …
-
A-1589-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY, : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Plaintiff-Appellant, : DOCKET NO. A-1589-24 v. : … Then the judge asked the prosecutor how defendant could have a fair trial if a jury hears about three different … cases to prove identity, and thus the counts should not have been severed. Moreover, the incidents occurred within …
-
A-0204-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… : : : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: A-00204-24T2 Civil Action On appeal from: … a good reason why we find ourselves at this juncture, I haven’t heard it.” (1T21-22:24). The motion judge, … January 22, 2025, A-000204-24, AMENDED 6 wound. You haven’t really heard a really good reason why at this …
-
A-0640-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… COURT OF NEW JERSEY STATE OF NEW JERSEY, : APPELLATE DIVISION : Plaintiff, : DOCKET NO. A-000640-24-T4 : v. : ON … State at most 1 The appropriate statutory reference should have been N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a. State v. Cummings, 184 N.J. … not intoxicated so I can let you go home or you’re going to have to be arrested....” 11T108-13/15. Arrest. When …
-
1.12K
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… CHARGE 1.12K — Page 1 of 1 1.12 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD CHARGE (Approved 11/98) K. Credibility (short version) You will have to decide which witnesses to believe and which …
-
njcourts.gov
… (2T45). III. THE STATEMENTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED BECAUSE GONZALEZ NEITHER VALIDLY WAIVED …
-
njcourts.gov
… RACHELLE L. HARZ J.8.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 632 Master Docket No. MCL … to as "HealthPlus"), in Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Case No. 632, in which the discovery …
-
njcourts.gov
… Change for Billing Under R. 1:28-2 ONLY for attorneys who have been granted an exception to mandatory electronic …
-
njcourts.gov
… RACHELLE L. HARZ J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNIY CASE NO. 632 Master Docket No. … to as "HealthPlus"), in Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Case No. 632, in which the discovery …
-
njcourts.gov
… IN RE ALLERGAN • SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASENO.634 Master Docket No. … Allergan Litigation in Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Case No. 634, in which the discovery …
-
njcourts.gov
… IN RE: ELMIRON SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 638 Master Docket No. … Elmiron Litigation in Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Case No. 638, in which the discovery …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY It is ORDERED that the August 29, 2018 omnibus order designating those Municipal Court judges authorized to handle adult and minor involuntary commitment initial hearings, review hearings, and conversion hearings, with the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Tasigna Litigation in Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Case No. 635, in which the discovery …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, P.J.Cv. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY MCL637 MASTERDOCKETNO. ATL-L-481-22 … this 16th day of July 2024, ORDERED as follows: Defendants have selected Jillian Silas v. Merck & Co .• Inc., et. al., …
-
njcourts.gov
… is ORDERED that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:6A-13, Appellate Division Judge Richard J. Geiger, retired on pension and …
-
njcourts.gov
NOTICE TO THE BAR LAWYERS’ FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION DEADLINES FOR FILING CLAIMS Any person having a claim that has not been filed involving the following attorneys must file a claim with the New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection prior to the …