Filters
- A-0683-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0683-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP-354-04. Joseph E. … judge agreed with Dr. Harris's opinion that M.E.H. "would have a hard time negotiating the level of being held …
- A-0057-19T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0057-19T3 DAVID HARAK, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … case law, the ALJ determined "the work-related accident may have aggravated or accelerated [Harak's] condition, but the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2872-20 KENNETH BARR, Appellant, v. NEW … he was not the aggressor, Barr claims the charge should not have been sustained and was not supported by substantial … or unreasonable. Any arguments made by Barr that we have not addressed directly lack sufficient merit to warrant …
- A-2177-20 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RASHON S. GIBBS (19-05-0308, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2177-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … as well as the facts set forth in this Affidavit, I have probable cause to believe and do believe that being … data pertaining to the shooting. To the extent we have not addressed them, any remaining arguments raised by …
- A-0220-21 – IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN GUERRERA, ETC. (GPA-0004-20, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0220-21 IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN … Criminal History Check as well as the NCIC III check. You have the right to file an appeal within 30 days of receiving … investigative experience and to any expertise he appears to have developed in administering the statute." Weston, 60 …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1314-21 WILLIAM KIANKA, JR., … Rathblott was issued, New Jersey law has evolved, and we have held that a special relationship must be shown to a … identify any facts that defendant knew or reasonably should have known that they were undertaking a duty to protect him …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2969-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … and allowed "[b]oth Albert [Jr.] and Ronald . . . to have their counsel fees paid from the estates for any and … fees. The beneficiaries and other interested parties should have an opportunity to object to any award of fees or the …
- A-1245-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1245-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment No. 17-01-0038. Esther … did not carry a presumption of imprisonment, which would have implicated the consequences of the repeal of N.J.S.A. …
- A-4016-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4016-15T4 PEG LEG WEBB, LLC, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … approval of petitioner's application. A-4016-15T4 12 We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and …
- A-0545-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Indictment No. 11-07-0721. Joseph E. … A-0545-15T1 defendant: "Do you understand that because you have pled guilty to these charges the court must impose a 5 …
- A-5357-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5357-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and again, I pray for you. So telling me that you already have plans (even [though] you are at home) because of the … to hear and see the 6 A-5357-14T2 witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
- A-3672-16T1/A-3673-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3672-16T1 A-3673-16T1 NEW JERSEY … convincing evidence. And although the trial judge should have more fully set forth the legal basis for his decision, … v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591, 605 (1986)). The Division does not have to prove physical abuse or neglect to terminate …
- A-5039-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5039-15T1 DEANNA TOMASSO-ADDEO, … remedy here – that plaintiff receive the $55,000 she would have received but for defendant's non-compliance with the … the house. Defendant next argues the trial court should not have awarded counsel fees because he was not acting in bad …
- A-0441-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0441-16T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Probate Part, Somerset County, Docket No. 12-00298. … terms introduced by the word "may." The committee would have used only the abbreviation TOD except for the …
- A-0923-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0923-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … argues that his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b) does not … N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a). We further note that repeat offenders have no constitutional right to written or oral notice of …
- A-4986-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4986-14T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … Currier. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP- 704-14. Joseph E. … Taken together, the court found these conditions make T.R. "have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
- A-2411-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2411-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of a handgun. We conclude the suppression motion should have been granted. We reverse the order denying suppression … in its assertion of illegality." Id. at 272. Our courts have held that an anonymous tip without more "is rarely …
- A-1288-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1288-17T3 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF … occasionally babysat Beth, told the caseworker he did not have any 4 A-1288-17T3 concerns about domestic violence in … The Division's report concluded, [t]hough [Beth] did not have any marks or bruises on her, her half-sister [Kim] was …
- A-3225-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3225-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … findings were "so wide of the mark that a mistake must have been made." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. M.M., … as the moving party bears the burden of proving that events have occurred subsequent to the entry of a judgment to …
- A-2532-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2532-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "was extremely un-cooperative verbally" and told him: "you have no right to stop me and I have nothing in the car." At this point, Fox detained both …