njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2446-23 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … Argued April 7, 2025 – Decided August 5, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … concerning Robert's 2009 will took seven months to complete, involved the testimony of fifty witnesses, caused …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3786-23 KUSUM FOODS, INC., … Submitted June 4, 2025 – Decided August 1, 2025 Before Judges Currier and Paganelli. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … judgment for defendants on the counterclaim and third-party complaint for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0026-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued January 6, 2025 – Decided July 7, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … at the time the crimes of which he was convicted were committed. In particular, he faults trial counsel for …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0494-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted February 26, 2025 – Decided June 25, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … onto an exit ramp, violently crashing into a guardrail, becoming airborne, and landing in the opposite direction …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1570-23 NOHA SALEH, … Submitted April 29, 2025 – Decided May 15, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Augostini. On appeal from the Superior … children. On January 18, 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce against defendant. In late 2019, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0561-23 JOSHUA ABRAMS, … Submitted January 23, 2025 – Decided May 1, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk and Paganelli. On appeal from the … appeals from various trial court orders dismissing his complaint, with prejudice, and awarding defendant Richard …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and sister. The family resided in Eatontown, initially on visitor visas. Defendant’s parents obtained legal permanent … to apply for a two-year forbearance of removal, thus becoming eligible for work authorization. Dep't of Homeland …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3183-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued April 3, 2025 – Decided April 21, 2025 Before Judges Natali, Walcott-Henderson, and Vinci. On appeal … an immediate left turn from Bond Street onto 5 A-3183-22 Community Lane and almost collided with a vehicle heading …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2672-22 IRA RUSSACK, individually, … AGHARTA RR FLETCHER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, AGHARTA FLETCHER HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited … LEVITIN & ASSOCIATES, PC, FLETCHER OFFICE CENTER LLC, a NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE …
njcourts.gov › notices to the bar
… NOTICE TO THE BAR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO LANDLORD TENANT FORMS AND PROCESSES- PUBLICATION FOR COMMENT The Supreme Court seeks comment on the following … Email Telephone Number Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Special Civil Part County , Docket Number: LT Name …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5407-09T3 FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAROLD …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … HSJ PROPERTIES, L.L.C., a Kansas Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRET GARDEN LANDSCAPING …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … with such force that it struck Sadler in the back. Carroll complained to Ennis. Approximately twenty minutes later, as …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1175-19 PATERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY, … Submitted May 31, 2022 – Decided June 15, 2022 Before Judges Sumners and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … part that plaintiff "will develop and operate low[-]income housing on Riverside Terrace and [plaintiff] will …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1931-20 STEVEN FERRARA, … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Argued May 2, 2022 – Decided June 10, 2022 Before Judges Messano and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1443-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 2022 Resubmitted July 19, 2022 – Decided August 4, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … Gerardo Rivera-Robles arrived by car at the apartment complex designated for the physical exchange of drugs and …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0180-20 J.P., a minor, by his mother, S.A., as Guardian Ad Litem for J.P., and S.A., individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … lead teacher. Because of the child study team member's recommendation, S.A. stated she also hired Miller to babysit …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0891-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted February 7, 2022 – Decided March 16, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … OF AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING FACTORS WERE NOT BASED ON "COMPETENT, REASONABLY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE," STATE v. CASE, 220 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued March 3, 2022 – Decided March 15, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … raises the following contentions: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY ISSUING A JURY CHARGE ON 3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted January 3, 2022 – Decided March 3, 2022 Before Judges Sumners and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … WITNESSES UNDERSTOOD THEIR DUTY TO TELL THE TRUTH AND WERE COMPETENT TO TESTIFY UNDER N.J.R.E. 601. (NOT RAISED BELOW). …