-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5139-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … A MANIFESTLY EXCESSIVE SENTENCE THAT REQUIRES REVERSAL. We have considered these arguments in light of the record and … her post-Miranda warning statements and instead should have followed the Court's holding in O'Neill, which, she …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4839-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … was stopped for driving while suspended in New Jersey. We have considered defendant's arguments in light of the record … of suspension, not periods when driving privileges could have been restored but for the defendant's failure to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4955-15T2 IN THE MATTER OF RUSSELL S. … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [In re … a toll collection monitoring system record was made shall have jurisdiction to hear violations of the toll collection …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5496-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … for the protection of such other person. Additionally, we have explained that "[t]he defense is valid if the defendant … sentence must be affirmed even if the reviewing court would have reached another result. State v. O'Donnell, 117 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2227-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … must "determine whether the findings made could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … next turn to defendant's argument that the police did not have probable cause to arrest defendant for DWI. In finding …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2338-18T2 SAMANTHA WHITE, … the [c]ourt had previously given to plaintiff's counsel to have [an] additional [thirty] days to make that connection … 2000); Reynolds v. Gonzalez, 172 N.J. 266, 282 (2002). We have stated: It is generally plaintiff's burden to prove not …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2653-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … same standard when deciding whether the trial judge should have ordered the entry of a judgment of acquittal. State v. … a deadly weapon, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(2). As we have explained, S.M. testified that on February 15, 2013, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2686-22 HUDSON COUNTY IMPROVEMENT … good a position monetarily as the owner would 11 A-2686-22 have occupied had the property not been taken.'" Ibid. … does not invalidate the HCIA's offer. Mariana could have provided credible information to support its …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3499-22 MARGARET KLEINMAN, ESQ., … establish the duty or its breach"). 8 A-3499-22 Our courts have established that the common knowledge exception is … Senna v. Florimont, 196 N.J. 469, 474 (2008). We have explained: A defamatory statement is one that is false …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0887-23 RIO VISTA MAHWAH HOMEOWNERS … L-4050-22. George J. Cotz, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In this one-sided appeal, … he did "not believe any of the parties to the action have a position on the finding of contempt; and in any case, …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2506-21 STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C.S., a … 438, 457 (2011)). Relevant here, "[t]he witness need not have witnessed the crime or been present when the photograph … any alleged error 'unless it is of such a nature as to have been clearly capable of producing an unjust result.'" …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1773-21 D.D.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of Paragraph 5.1 of the MSA was warranted, she wanted to "have the financial information" to decide whether … family matters. Cesare v. Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 411- 3 We have eliminated the point describing the standard of review …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1533-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … defendant's belief that the victim called police to have him evicted and the fact that the victim had reported … v. Kasabucki, 52 N.J. 110, 116 (1968)). New Jersey courts have adopted the United States Supreme Court's …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1255-21 M.B., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to annoy or alarm defendant, and in fact did so. We have considered the record and conclude there was ample … of law, is unassailable. 16 A-1255-21 To the extent we have not specifically addressed any of defendant's remaining …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1299-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to be searched" since his arrest. As such, there would have been 12 A-1299-23 no need to access defendant's phone … N.J. Super. at 21. Similarly, because "[cell phone] users have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their [cell …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5740-17T3 DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. F- 016051-09. Anibal … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1869-18T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket No. UNCC00181418. Thomas G. … when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy." N.J. …
njcourts.gov › notices to the bar
… amicus curiae are qualitatively different from parties who have a direct stake or liberty interest in the outcome of …
Court Year, Court Terms
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
… is divided into three terms of four months' duration, a division which presently has significance with respect only to … In accordance with the Committee recommendation, the division of the court year into three terms will be maintained … does not apply to judicial assignments. Those assignments have continued to be made for a year beginning on September …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
… 97 N.J. 651 (1984), has been inserted. No other changes have been made. … Directive #07-82 Directive: Verbatim …