njcourts.gov
… courts have 'a limited role' in the review of [Commission] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3088-18T1 COUNTY OF HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued September 29, 2020 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… into a pretrial intervention program, and any adverse decisions reserved as part of a conditional guilty plea. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1391-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF A USE VARIANCE APPLICATION SUBMITTED AS PART OF FILE NO. 17-239 MEPT LINCOLN CROSSING LLC/LINCOLN GATEWAY – NEW BLDG/ VARIANCE BLOCK 451.01, LOT 14.011, IN THE …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5633-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTONIO F. VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued October 26, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Mayer. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… Board supervises the work of the . . . Tribunal. Moreover, decisions of the . . . Tribunal that are not appealed become decisions of the Board. . . . N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). …
-
njcourts.gov
… body actions are presumed valid when making discretionary decisions, N.Y. SMSA L.P. v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2071-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.P.C., Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Submitted February 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1699-16T4 PAUL J. KENNEDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________________ Submitted January 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, …
-
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3465-16T1 MELISSA LEMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BTS HOLDINGS, LLC, and CRAIG LAX, Defendants-Respondents, and HAMID ABASSI, Defendant. Argued September 20, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0196-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COREY O. REAVES, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Submitted November 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and …
-
njcourts.gov
… has decided on his own funeral or burial arrangements, the decisions are binding, but those decisions must be in writing. . . . . 5 Other portions of … will, or designate a personal representative to make those decisions. Ibid. A reasonable interpretation of the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0012-22 GRAND MAUJER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOLLISTER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, and ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, and BRACH EICHLER, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant. ARCH …
-
njcourts.gov
… courts have 'a limited role' in the review of [Commission] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) …
-
njcourts.gov
… Rothman, 65 N.J. 219, 232 (1974)). We evaluate Family Part decisions concerning equitable distribution under an abuse … made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions that counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… the direct cause prong of the statute.3 II. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited, with …
-
njcourts.gov
… 43, 51 (App. Div. 2011). Our function is to review "agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
-
njcourts.gov
… of review when considering the factual findings and decisions of Tax Court judges." Presbyterian Home at …
-
njcourts.gov
… pregnancy." We, therefore, affirm the Family Part judge's decisions for the reasons below. I. We recite the relevant … 455 N.J. Super. 12, 29 (App. Div. 2018). We examine such decisions for an abuse of that discretion. See H.R., 431 …