-
njcourts.gov
… reconsider a March 27, 2018 order that compelled him to pay child support and other child care expenses, and denied his request to require …
default
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
njcourts.gov
… seeking joint legal custody, shared parenting time, child support, and other relief. Defendant filed responsive … 26 A-0420-19T2 of fact, especially when credibility determinations are involved, we do not defer on questions of …
-
njcourts.gov
… seeking joint legal custody, shared parenting time, child support, and other relief. Defendant filed responsive … 26 A-0420-19T2 of fact, especially when credibility determinations are involved, we do not defer on questions of …
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4212-18T4 custody orders involving her child with plaintiff, Anson B. Orr, a resident of New … 2018. Defendant claimed she was not served with any of the supporting papers. Defendant wrote to the Family Part judge … jurisdiction was not necessary to make a child custody determination. However, defendant subjected herself to …
-
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4212-18T4 custody orders involving her child with plaintiff, Anson B. Orr, a resident of New … 2018. Defendant claimed she was not served with any of the supporting papers. Defendant wrote to the Family Part judge … jurisdiction was not necessary to make a child custody determination. However, defendant subjected herself to …
default
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2521-21 A-0391-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … they contend there was insufficient evidence to support a prima facie case of abuse or neglect of Michael. … there was insufficient evidence to support the court's determination that their conduct towards Michael placed their …
njcourts.gov
… professionals who are truly dedicated and work together to support and monitor our participants’ recovery,” said …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… appellant/cross respondent answering the points raised in support of the cross appeal shall also include a reply …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… only upon the establishment of a prima facie case in support of post-conviction relief, a determination by the court that there are material issues of … be resolved by reference to the existing record, and a determination that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… himself or herself or others dependent upon him or her for support. The court may appoint counsel for the conservatee …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… The original of all motions or orders to show cause and all supporting papers shall be filed as follows: if a case has …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… be appended to the petition. Legal argument, if any, in support of the petitioner's contentions shall be submitted …
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
-
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …