Filters
- A-2992-21 - AILUN XIN VS. LI TAN (L-1523-20, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2992-21 AILUN XIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-1523-20. Li Tan, … DUE TO NOVEL LEGAL ISSUE). None of defendant's arguments have been addressed by the trial court because he did not …
- Dukeminier – Order of Dismissal with Prejudice Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… LLC IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY JAMIE DUKEMINIER, Plaintiff, vs. … filed with the Clerk of the Court. I further certify that I have forwarded copies of the within Stipulation of Dismissal …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3244-21 JOSE VELEZ, Appellant, v. NEW … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … Co., 62 N.J. 229, 234 (1973)). Finally, to the extent we have not specifically addressed arguments raised by Velez, …
- njcourts.gov… 102 NJ 21 (1985) (“...henceforth an attorney found to have misused escrow funds will confront the disbarment rule …
- Peremptory Challenges and the Right of Civic Engagement. Part 1. (Howard Berchtold. Will Snowden.) Documentnjcourts.gov… that their participation does not matter. • Individuals who have previously reported to the court, only to be …
- A-0757-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0757-15T1 MYEONG H. CHOI, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. … of the arbitrator's withdrawal. At present, the parties have been left without a forum for litigating their divorce …
- A-3551-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3551-15T2 OWEN FORENSIC SERVICES,1 … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. DC- 0679-16. Mary … plaintiff performed the services timely and properly. We have no reasons to disturb these findings. On the …
- A-2558-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2558-16T2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Ocean County, Docket No. F-002766-15. Margaret Noel, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1867-23 GEORGE NICHOLSON, JR., … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Docket No. L-0002-23. NOT FOR … the class action should be certified. To the extent we have not specifically addressed them, plaintiff's remaining …
- Judiciary Ombudsman Program Form Document Filenjcourts.gov… • Basic information about what the requirements are to have your case considered by the court • Some information …
- Notice – Attorneys Removed from the 2024 IOLTA Ineligible List Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… the Bar of New Jersey declares that the following attorneys have satisfied the requirement of R 1:28A:2(a) and their …
- Notice - Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection - Attorneys Reinstated from the 2024 Ineligible List Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar1 NOTICE ATTORNEYS REINSTATED FROM THE NEW JERSEY LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION 2024 INELIGIBLE LIST The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of the …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOHN JOHNS (05-08-1618, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1693-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … motion for resentencing. Defendant argued the judge should have applied mitigating factor fourteen 6 A-1693-21 … Division's affirmance of my denial of your PCR, you should have made an application to appeal the Appellate Division. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0701-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHALLENGE … Furthermore, municipal 7 A-0701-22 representatives have been invited to and regularly attend both. Meadowlands … This deference "stems from the recognition that agencies have the 9 A-0701-22 specialized expertise necessary to …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0804-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … The court said that "concerns around P.S.'s mental health have persisted since the time of B.S.'s birth." 3. The court … of standby counsel. Defendant now claims she should not have been permitted to represent herself because before the …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KEVIN D. ROBERTS (14-09-2285, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3811-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … with the implication that the license plate number could have been discovered from other sources, which is the … had any objection to the recommended sentence, he should have raised it during the plea negotiations or before he was …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HANIF THOMPSON (14-09-2285, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3816-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … SEARCH WARRANT, THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED. I We discern the following facts from the … with the implication that the license plate number could have been discovered from other sources, which is the …
- E.A.O. VS. S.A.O. (FV-03-1367-19, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3490-18T2 E.A.O., Plaintiff-Respondent, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Burlington County, Docket No. … a "rehearing" before a different judge. 3 A-3490-18T2 We have considered these arguments in light of the record and …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1425-19T1 KLEIN OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, … record. This court cannot find that determination to have been arbitrary or capricious. In conclusion the trial … is not eligible for hardship status. To the extent we have not already discussed them specifically, defendant 's …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1269-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED … FAILURE OF ALTICE USA, INC., TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE NEW JERSEY CABLE TELEVISION ACT, N.J.S.A. … prohibition on charges for service that was not provided have the effect of prescribing a daily rate for the service …