Filters
- njcourts.gov… to the infractions and compared to others who have been disciplined in the past for more serious offenses. …
- Consent Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice – Simmons Hanly Cases Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… GYNECARE LITIGATION, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY MASTER DOCKET NO. BER-L-011575-14 … Order on Covid-19 issues entered on March 27, 2020, "The provisions of Rule 1 :32-2A(c} and all other Court Rules …
- Notice - Attorneys Removed from the 2024 IOLTA Ineligible List Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… the Bar of New Jersey declares that the following attorneys have satisfied the requirement of R 1:28A:2(a) and their …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0070-22 PINE INVESTMENTS, LLC, … of the Fair Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A 2A:50-53 to -68, but have not renewed that argument on appeal. 4 A-0070-22 later … "monthly late fee" of $131.08, plaintiff does not appear to have added the late fees to the total due. Defendants …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0552-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … AUTHENTICATED AND LACKED FOUNDATION AND THUS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ADMITTED. POINT III – THE TRIAL COURT'S … has the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4673-17T2 MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION BILLING, … they are not parties to the billing services agreement and have no liability for Millennium's obligations under the … or deny arbitration de novo because whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate is a question of law. Hirsch, 215 …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4421-15T2 A-0195-16T2 280 ERIE STREET, … by proofs that preclude the possibility that there could have been any set of facts known to the legislative body or which could reasonably be assumed to have been known which would rationally support a conclusion …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0207-15T4 EDWARD JODZIO, … residential use of the property. Rather, the improvements have caused regular flooding on plaintiff's land, including … law); see also Ross, 222 N.J. at 505, 510 ("Our courts have adopted the standard of Restatement section 822 to 12 …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0070-22 PINE INVESTMENTS, LLC, … of the Fair Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A 2A:50-53 to -68, but have not renewed that argument on appeal. 4 A-0070-22 later … "monthly late fee" of $131.08, plaintiff does not appear to have added the late fees to the total due. Defendants …
- A-4421-15T2/A-0195-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4421-15T2 A-0195-16T2 280 ERIE STREET, … by proofs that preclude the possibility that there could have been any set of facts known to the legislative body or which could reasonably be assumed to have been known which would rationally support a conclusion …
- A-0207-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0207-15T4 EDWARD JODZIO, … residential use of the property. Rather, the improvements have caused regular flooding on plaintiff's land, including … law); see also Ross, 222 N.J. at 505, 510 ("Our courts have adopted the standard of Restatement section 822 to 12 …
- A-4673-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4673-17T2 MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION BILLING, … they are not parties to the billing services agreement and have no liability for Millennium's obligations under the … or deny arbitration de novo because whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate is a question of law. Hirsch, 215 …
- A-0552-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0552-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … AUTHENTICATED AND LACKED FOUNDATION AND THUS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ADMITTED. POINT III – THE TRIAL COURT'S … has the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
- Omnibus Order of Dismissals w/Prejudice #21 (Kline & Specter Cases) Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… 12 D SUPERIOR COURT OF NEWf,,i.[Jjf-SR1202, - ~lLs LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUWS,~L.~ CASE NO. 291 MASTER DOCKET NO.: … or otherwise, and the settlement funds for each plaintiff have been disbursed to plaintiffs' counsel, and for good …
- A-0621-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… BOARDWALK INC. : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : APPELLATE DIVISION : DOCKET NO. A-621-23 : On Appeal from Orders dated … that may be incurred by Jersey Shore if they ultimately have to move any of the substantial improvements made on the … both Lot 3 and the Subject Property, Lot 3.01, are and have been listed on Borough Tax records for many years as …
- Order admitting Andrew D. Tharp, Esq. Pro Hac Vice – ATL-L-794-19 Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… JOHN C. PORTO, ,lS.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 630 Civil Action MASTER … of Tennessee, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested Andrew D. Tharp, Esquire to represent them in … ATL-L-1457-19 304. Carrell, Melinda ATL-L-1460-19 305. Schooley, Debra ATL-L-1455-19 306. Chrissis, Timothy …
- Order admitting Katelyn E. Marshall, Esq. Pro Hac Vice – ATL-L-794-19 Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERJOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 630 Civil Action MASTER … of Tennessee, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested Katelyn E. Marshall, Esquire to represent … ATL-L-1457-19 304. Carrell, Melinda ATL-L-1460-19 305. Schooley, Debra ATL-L-1455-19 306. Chrissis, Timothy …
- Order admitting Robin Shah, Esq. Pro Hac Vice – ATL-L-794-19 Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… JOHN C,. PORTO, J,S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 630 Civil Action MASTER … PM Pg 2 of 3 Trans ID: LCV20201912128 that Defendants have requested Robin Shah, Esquire to represent them in this … ATL-L-1457-19 306. Carrell, Melinda ATL-L-1460-19 307. Schooley, Debra ATL-L-1455-19 308. Chrissis, Timothy …
- Order - 2025 Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a) Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names of those attorneys who have neither made full payment to the Fund, the Disciplinary … whose names appear on the attached Ineligible List have, as of the date of this Order, failed either to make …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAVAN JOHNSON (22-06-0410, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4099-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment No. 22-06-0410. Jennifer N. … analyzed these issues in view of the governing law. We have considered defendant's arguments in light of the …