-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4375-18T3 CHABAD OF OLD TAPPAN, INC. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-8946-18. Morton R. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… Div. 2000).7 In sum, the court finds that plaintiffs, who have the burden of proof, have not proven that the County Board’s judgment, which is …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1758-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … but he also fails to demonstrate that the [c]ourt would have accepted the new plea offer after he had signed the … and, but for the deficient performance, the result would have been different. Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 687, 104 …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0217-15T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … "deference to the findings of [] trial judges because they have the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4512-14T1 R.C. SEARCH CO., INC. and … to reference the appendix or transcripts. Nonetheless, we have reviewed Cecere's arguments in light of the record, and … Cecere argues that the majority of attorney's fees should have been allocated to his now defunct corporation, R.C. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4465-18T2 DONALD UNGER, … after the discharge of his prior counsel, he appears to have attempted to file the confirmation of the award pro se. … eventual as within time default judgment where other rights have vested in the interim). Accordingly, we affirm the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0509-18T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County. Randolph H. Wolf argued the cause for … the expungement statute to sexual offenses only, it could have said so in the 2016 amendments because by then N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3057-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … law and practice. In the alternative, the State seeks to have this case remanded to allow the trial court to address … not discretionary. Hernandez, 208 N.J. at 37. These credits have a constitutional foundation, moreover, and "were …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3517-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION … the Board concluded that "as a physician, Dr. Jitan should have been aware of less personally invasive clinical methods … over the years. Jitan also argues that the Board should not have considered the detective's testimony concerning his …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5357-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … filed his PCR petition. Defendant argued he was entitled to have his November 10, 2008 plea vacated on ineffective … U.S. at 690, 104 S. Ct. at 2066, 80 L. Ed. 2d at 695. We have considered defendant's contentions in light of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4331-18T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … believe T.T. had a personality disorder because he had behaved himself while in the controlled atmosphere of the STU. Dr. Cooke conceded that defendant did not have access to female or child victims while confined. Dr. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2424-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the statutory time bar for filing his PCR petition should have been relaxed in the interests of justice. We agree that … thorough thirty-six-page written opinion. To the extent we have not addressed any remaining arguments, we determine …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2504-17T1 THE WOLF LAW FIRM, LLC, … received an email from the client that stated: "I . . . have decided to FIRE you Andy Wolf due to unsatisfied service. I have been unhappy with your service. They did not meet my …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1507-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 26, 2016 date awarded by the trial court; defendant did not have to wait until his bail was revoked on the aggravated … offenses related to those warrants and the ties they may have to the July periods of incarceration or this case.8 The …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0481-18T2 GEBROE-HAMMER ASSOCIATES, … (50%) of the [p]ercentages then held by all [m]embers shall have the right to act for and bind the [LLC] in the ordinary … Plaintiff's proffered evidence was not challenged. As we have previously stated: [W]here the broker has procured a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5530-18T1 DIANE RAMOS, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … arthroscopic surgery in January 2011 and was found to have "a full- thickness chondral lesion of her lateral …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1551-19T3 THE NATURE USA CORPORATION and … defendants' motion were granted, because plaintiffs would have to "renew their litigation now years after the initial … circumstances justifying the vacatur of a default judgment have been found in various circumstances, none of which are …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4861-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … did not assert a colorable claim of innocence, he did not have clear, forceful reasons to withdraw his plea, he … not show that but for counsel's alleged errors, he would have rejected the plea and gone to trial. Moreover, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0630-19T2 NDEYE SENE EP NDIAYE … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Hudson County, Docket No. … not entitled to notice under Rule 5:5-10. To the extent we have not specifically addressed any of defendant's remaining …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4633-19T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 95-06-2284. Joseph E. … defendant failed to show that continued incarceration would have a deleterious effect on his health, see Wright, 221 …