-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3446-19 BLITEI, LLC, … 2017. She certified she never received notice, nor did she have any knowledge of, any pending foreclosure action … consistent with plaintiff's explanation that the server may have misheard or mis-transcribed the name of the person he …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0652-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … an unexplained bulge in defendant's clothing that might have been a weapon" and did not see defendant make any … the two unidentified men who quickly left the area. Courts "have recognized that to 'substantial dealers in 8 A-0652-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0888-19 NELSON VILLANUEVA, Appellant, v. … any timely request for a polygraph examination would have been denied. We next consider Villanueva's argument, … arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. To the extent we have not addressed any of Villanueva's remaining arguments, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0519-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … SENTENCE WOULD BE "A GRAVE INJUSTICE," COULD PROPERLY HAVE DENIED THE STATE'S APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENDED TERM AS … He emphasizes that without the parole disqualifier he would have been eligible for probation based on his jail credits. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1153-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 99 N.J. 123 (1985). Since the judge found the court did not have jurisdiction to consider the motion, such an analysis … does not qualify for a judicial furlough as she does not have an extremely rare medical condition that requires …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5284-17T4 JOHN ARIAS, Appellant, v. NEW … racist[] comments by [two] officers []. Today the problems have gotten worse and on a daily basis they include threats, … and the video were not confidential and those materials have been filed as part of the record in this matter. 5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… October 24, 2019 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1432-18T1 G.P.D., Plaintiff-Respondent, … acts should be considered 'regardless of whether those acts have been the subject of a domestic violence adjudication.'" … law enforcement about his alleged concern that someone may have molested his son was "consistent with making a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0040-18T2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. F- 021941-15. Beckett … assignment of the mortgage prior to filing the complaint to have standing in a foreclosure action); see also Capital …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1449-18T3 INTELLIAN CAPITAL ADVISORS, … herself as President of [plaintiff]" and did not have authority to file the mortgage discharge. On the … must dispose of all claims against all parties. "To have the finality required to create appellate jurisdiction, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1696-16T4 LIBERTY GREENS ASSOCIATION, … substantive arguments. First, the trial court should not have applied collateral estoppel to his challenges to the … in LGA I. We recognize that collateral estoppel would not have barred Bergeron from showing that he paid association …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4994-16T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County, Docket No. 2011-1105. Mark J. … personally paid certain Estate expenses which should have been paid from the Vanguard accounts. The judge …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2197-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … time and place.” No “person of ordinary intelligence” would have any difficulty “know[ing] what is prohibited [by … at 106 (citation omitted). The judge, however, should not have considered the doctrine of lenity, 8 A-2197-16T3 "which …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3270-16T3 CRISTOBAL J. POLANCO, … things that you should not consider, any testimony that I have stricken from the 6 A-3270-16T3 record. This means that … of the various witnesses, defendants assert the jury should have been apprised of Cristobal's misleading statement and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0805-15T3 MARIA PULICE and FRANK PULICE, … the risk by engaging in strenuous physical activities that have a potential to result in injuries. Any requirement to … result of gross negligence by defendants. To the extent we have not addressed any of plaintiff's remaining issues, it …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5266-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Indictment No. 16-12-3331. Joseph E. … 4 A-5266-17T4 . . . . Please be advised that you have ten (10) days from receipt of this letter to appeal the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3464-16T2 MARY E. BRESLIN, … (App. Div. 2004) (citation omitted). "[C]ontroversies which have become moot or academic prior to judicial resolution … a quorum is present. Written notice of said meeting shall have been sent to all Unit Owners at least thirty days in …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3594-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … argued that, during the suppression hearing, the judge may have felt responsible for permitting defendant to adopt the … adoption hearing. The PCR court also noted defendant could have but did not raise the question of the judge's alleged …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1896-16T2 PNC BANK, N.A., … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case." … Super. 323, 350 (Ch. Div. 2010) ("[L]itigants generally have no standing to assert the rights of third parties."); …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4702-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … defendant was entitled to know why someone in the car might have "set [him] up[,]" and he was entitled to an opportunity … 390. Disclosure may be necessary where the informant "might have been a material witness" and "was the only witness in …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5555-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 2C:12-1.2; and fourth-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(a). We recite the following … psychosis, depression, or cognitive impairments that would have adversely affected defendant's fitness to proceed at …