njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5486-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … point for our consideration: THE SUPPRESSION MOTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE THE POLICE CONDUCTED A SEIZURE OF … [had] the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the feel of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2292-15T4 MARIE SIX, … Rowe Price account subject to equitable distribution should have been $1,017,035.98. Defendant also asserted that his … Defendant claims that the $400,000 premarital asset should have been subtracted from the account and then the remaining …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5357-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and again, I pray for you. So telling me that you already have plans (even [though] you are at home) because of the … to hear and see the 6 A-5357-14T2 witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0923-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … argues that his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b) does not … N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a). We further note that repeat offenders have no constitutional right to written or oral notice of …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4986-14T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … Currier. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP- 704-14. Joseph E. … Taken together, the court found these conditions make T.R. "have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2252-15T2 V.J., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not rise to the level of harassment because he did not have the purpose to alarm or annoy plaintiff; (3) there was … provocations were relevant and the trial court should have considered those provocations. Our scope of review is …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0857-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 13- 10-2497. Joseph E. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0196-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Defendant appeals from his sentence, arguing that he should have been sentenced under amendments to N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 … refers to when defendant pled guilty or is convicted. We have already rejected this argument. See Scudieri, 469 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… LITIGATION : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 631 Civil Action MASTER … Inhibitor claims are filed, or should this court have failed to identify all of the Proton-Pump Inhibitors … be erased under existing programs until opposing counsel have been, or will be, notified of all existing programs …
-
njcourts.gov
… LITIGATION : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 631 Civil Action MASTER … Inhibitor claims are filed, or should this court have failed to identify all of the Proton-Pump Inhibitors … be erased under existing programs until opposing counsel have been, or will be, notified of all existing programs …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0923-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … argues that his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b) does not … N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a). We further note that repeat offenders have no constitutional right to written or oral notice of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0057-19T3 DAVID HARAK, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … case law, the ALJ determined "the work-related accident may have aggravated or accelerated [Harak's] condition, but the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5351-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … As such, it is only required if "after all other warnings have been provided, a person detained for driving while …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0592-17T1 KEITH HELD, … the home state's law. N.J.S.A. 39:5D- 4(a)(2) and (c). We have held that New York's "driving while ability impaired" … similar to a New Jersey DWI offense. Our decision to have the factual record developed more fully in this …
-
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. Isaac A. Young (A-61-16) … Instead, the Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … a person or entity authorized by N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.10a(b) to have such records, or that defendant encouraged such a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2969-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … and allowed "[b]oth Albert [Jr.] and Ronald . . . to have their counsel fees paid from the estates for any and … fees. The beneficiaries and other interested parties should have an opportunity to object to any award of fees or the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1314-21 WILLIAM KIANKA, JR., … Rathblott was issued, New Jersey law has evolved, and we have held that a special relationship must be shown to a … identify any facts that defendant knew or reasonably should have known that they were undertaking a duty to protect him …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Indictment No. 11-07-0721. Joseph E. … A-0545-15T1 defendant: "Do you understand that because you have pled guilty to these charges the court must impose a 5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0353-17T2 GUILIO MESADIEU, Appellant, v. … the following arguments: POINT [ONE] [] MESADIEU SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT GUILTY OF [*.306], [*.260], and [.256] … prohibited acts. "[I]n prison disciplinary matters we have not traditionally required elaborate written …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2532-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "was extremely un-cooperative verbally" and told him: "you have no right to stop me and I have nothing in the car." At this point, Fox detained both …