-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3744-21 EDARIEL MELENDEZ, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted November 28, 2023 – Decided December 8, 2023 Before Judges Mayer …
-
njcourts.gov
… as to revoke their public adjuster licenses for alleged violations of the New Jersey Public Adjusters' Act (the … 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). Moreover, given respondents' violations, the penalties are not so unduly harsh as to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1209-22 TRACY MALONEY, a/k/a TRACY DIMARCO and TRACY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________ Argued May 22, 2023 – Decided June 5, 2023 …
-
njcourts.gov
… an officer's 8 A-2956-21 duties; substantial or repeated violations of the Port Authority's rules and regulations; …
-
njcourts.gov
… an officer's 8 A-2956-21 duties; substantial or repeated violations of the Port Authority's rules and regulations; …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0565-21 IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER DUNLAP, FIRE FIGHTER (M1838W), TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE. ____________________________ Argued January 23, 2023 – Decided February 3, 2023 Before Judges Whipple …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2512-24 TIANLE LI, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted November 6, 2025 – Decided January 6, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Gummer. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2514-24 TIANLE LI, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted December 10, 2025 – Decided January 6, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and …
-
A-52-24 Respondent Response to Amicus Curiae Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… and other backward- looking remedies in response to violations of the NJCFLA and has a robust complaint mechanism by which consumers can report violations and seek enforcement action. See SC Dsb 24–25; SC …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0309-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOVY DELPHINE, a/k/a FRANTZ DEOPHIN, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Argued December 10, 2025 – Decided March 5, 2026 Before …
njcourts.gov
… against Defendm1t Cole Information Services, lnc., alleging violations of Daniel's Law, codi fied at N.J.S.A. 56:8- … presented evidence and expe1t testimony as to Defendant's violations of Daniel's Law, its continuing noncompliance … extensive investigati011 and mastery of Daniel's Law violations affecting more than I 0,000 Covered Persons. 4 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3406-23 TIMOTHY CAPONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTAGUE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued November 13, 2025 – Decided November 26, 2025 Before …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0889-24 ROBBINSVILLE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBBINSVILLE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ Argued October 15, 2025 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
… a controlled dangerous substance (CDS), simple assault and violations of probation.1 The recommendation in the PSA was …
njcourts.gov
… Elboghdady was acquitted of all charges and motor vehicle violations filed against her, and is not a party to this …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2340-21 IN THE MATTER OF LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent-Respondent, and LAKEWOOD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Petitioner-Appellant. _________________________ NEW JERSEY PUBLIC …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2096-21 SLUMPED KITCHEN, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted May 24, 2023 – Decided June …
njcourts.gov
… there is no evidence that the Board was aware of the violations and delayed–to the prejudice of defendants . . . …
njcourts.gov
… work. The jury also found that plaintiff had committed violations of regulations issued under the CFA, but … defendants had suffered no ascertainable loss from those violations. Therefore, the jury awarded no damages to … are entitled to attorneys' fees incurred in proving the violations of the CFA regulations; they are not entitled to …
njcourts.gov
… was made fully aware of his reporting obligations" and his violations were therefore "inarguably knowing." Id. at 167. …