njcourts.gov
… time agreement to permit a third party to pick up the child. We affirm. The parties have a child together, born in … defendant's paternity and entered a custody and child support order on June 4, 2020. The resulting Uniform Summary … 433 (App. Div. 2015)). We review a Family Part's legal determinations de novo. Id. at 565. Defendant raises the …
-
njcourts.gov
… time agreement to permit a third party to pick up the child. We affirm. The parties have a child together, born in … defendant's paternity and entered a custody and child support order on June 4, 2020. The resulting Uniform Summary … 433 (App. Div. 2015)). We review a Family Part's legal determinations de novo. Id. at 565. Defendant raises the …
njcourts.gov
… in violation of litigant's rights for failing to pay child support; fix defendant's child support arrears; and award … 394, 412 (1998)). Deference is given to the credibility determinations made by the trial judge who "hears the case, …
-
njcourts.gov
… in violation of litigant's rights for failing to pay child support; fix defendant's child support arrears; and award … 394, 412 (1998)). Deference is given to the credibility determinations made by the trial judge who "hears the case, …
njcourts.gov
… residential custody of the parties' son, fixed defendant's child support obligation and granted him "a substantial amount of … to remain in the same school. Therefore, the judge's determination that the custody and parenting time arrangement …
-
njcourts.gov
… residential custody of the parties' son, fixed defendant's child support obligation and granted him "a substantial amount of … to remain in the same school. Therefore, the judge's determination that the custody and parenting time arrangement …
-
njcourts.gov
… case, provide the Docket Number: If you have an existing child support order, provide the CS Number: Do you have an active … must be completed if the case involves alimony, spousal or child support, custody, parenting time (visitation) or …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2634-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Because we conclude the court's findings are not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record, we reverse. 1 Mike is a fictitious name used to protect the child's privacy; the same reason we use initials for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2634-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Because we conclude the court's findings are not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record, we reverse. 1 Mike is a fictitious name used to protect the child's privacy; the same reason we use initials for …
default
… The parties married in 1990 and divorced in 2009. Three children were born of the marriage; M.B.,1 a boy born … the "[p]arent of [a]lternate [r]esidence." Regarding support and maintenance of the children, Article III of the … evidence upon which a fair, reasonable, and just determination of child support and college contributions could …
-
njcourts.gov
… The parties married in 1990 and divorced in 2009. Three children were born of the marriage; M.B.,1 a boy born … the "[p]arent of [a]lternate [r]esidence." Regarding support and maintenance of the children, Article III of the … evidence upon which a fair, reasonable, and just determination of child support and college contributions could …
default
… to work out an agreement concerning custody of their two children and some of the issues related to supporting the children. The remaining issues, principally … and made specific factual findings supporting her alimony determinations. Among those findings, the judge found that the …
-
njcourts.gov
… to work out an agreement concerning custody of their two children and some of the issues related to supporting the children. The remaining issues, principally … and made specific factual findings supporting her alimony determinations. Among those findings, the judge found that the …
njcourts.gov
… parent to permanently relocate out of state with his or her child, despite the other parent’s opposition to the child’s … for determining the outcome of contested relocation determinations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. In place of the … child’s interest. The Court identified two developments in support of its alteration of the governing standard for …
-
njcourts.gov
… parent to permanently relocate out of state with his or her child, despite the other parent’s opposition to the child’s … for determining the outcome of contested relocation determinations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. In place of the … child’s interest. The Court identified two developments in support of its alteration of the governing standard for …
default
… appeals from a September 4, 2020 order that enforced his child support obligations. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … in April 2001 and divorced in December 2014. They have two children, who were born in March 2004 and September 2006. …
-
njcourts.gov
… appeals from a September 4, 2020 order that enforced his child support obligations. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … in April 2001 and divorced in December 2014. They have two children, who were born in March 2004 and September 2006. …
njcourts.gov
… defendant L.K. primary residential custody of the parties' children and permitted them to remain in California. We … to permanently remove the children to California; child support; and counsel fees. Both parties and their custody … to J.W.D., 149 N.J. 108, 117 (1997)). "Discretionary determinations, supported by the record, are examined to …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendant L.K. primary residential custody of the parties' children and permitted them to remain in California. We … to permanently remove the children to California; child support; and counsel fees. Both parties and their custody … to J.W.D., 149 N.J. 108, 117 (1997)). "Discretionary determinations, supported by the record, are examined to …
njcourts.gov
… 19, 2018 2 A-5574-15T4 state of Georgia under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), … seeking designation as the parent of primary residence. To support his application, defendant certified that after … 2A:34-66(a), once a state renders an initial custody determination, that state acquires "exclusive, continuing …