Filters
- A-4675-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4675-17T1 TAPPAN GOLD DRIVE RANGE, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-4401-16. 1 The correct … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- A-3960-16T1/A-3961-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-3960-16T1 A-3961-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, … May 3, 2017. We add the following comments. Defendants have eight other children who are not involved in this …
- A-3200-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3200-15T2 BANK OF AMERICA, NA, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. F-018541-14. Tressa M. … competent evidence to support any of her allegations. We have considered defendant's arguments in light of our review …
- A-1995-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1995-16T1 KEITH P. SEQUEIRA, … Suter. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L-3393-14. Keith P. … AND THIS COURT IMPERMISSIBLY DISREGARDED ATALESE.[2] We have considered these arguments in light of the record and …
- A-2609-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2609-16T2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. F-004895-16. George … de novo. Nicholas v. Mynster, 213 N.J. 463, 478 (2013). We have considered defendants' contentions in light of the …
- A-5461-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5461-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Sumners. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Indictment No. 12-08-1326. Leschak & … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id. at 694; State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. …
- A-1060-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1060-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Indictment No. 05-12-2254. Joseph … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- A-5138-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5138-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Manahan. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment No. 07-08-0681. Joseph E. … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. "[A] …
- A-2872-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2872-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, … We, thus, find the application of the incorrect standard to have been, in this particular case, harmless. We would …
- A-4584-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4584-15T3 NTL CAPITAL, LLC, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. F-008144-11. NOT FOR … 4 A-4584-15T3 entry of a default and that plaintiff did not have standing to sue. Defendants did not argue any defense …
- A-3266-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3266-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Haas. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment No. 16-09-1156. Cecilia … decision to deny PTI admission. This appeal followed. We have held that PTI is a diversionary program designed to …
- A-1949-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1949-16T2 BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA (BNC … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, DJ- 116272-16. George Stephanis, … the March judgment, and thus the March judgment should not have been domesticated in New Jersey. Plaintiff argues that …
- A-5045-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5045-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 90-09-4369. Marcus … proceedings, or by Rule 3:22-5, because the arguments could have been raised in prior proceedings. Id. at 8. We agreed …
- A-3147-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3147-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Sumners. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, Municipal Appeal No. 6077. Levow DWI … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in …
- A-1558-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1558-15T3 NEIL EPSTEIN, … Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Docket No. L-2467- 14. Christopher M. … (internal quotations and citation omitted). "However, we have also cautioned that legal sufficiency requires …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0070-22 PINE INVESTMENTS, LLC, … of the Fair Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A 2A:50-53 to -68, but have not renewed that argument on appeal. 4 A-0070-22 later … "monthly late fee" of $131.08, plaintiff does not appear to have added the late fees to the total due. Defendants …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0552-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … AUTHENTICATED AND LACKED FOUNDATION AND THUS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ADMITTED. POINT III – THE TRIAL COURT'S … has the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4673-17T2 MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION BILLING, … they are not parties to the billing services agreement and have no liability for Millennium's obligations under the … or deny arbitration de novo because whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate is a question of law. Hirsch, 215 …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4421-15T2 A-0195-16T2 280 ERIE STREET, … by proofs that preclude the possibility that there could have been any set of facts known to the legislative body or which could reasonably be assumed to have been known which would rationally support a conclusion …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0207-15T4 EDWARD JODZIO, … residential use of the property. Rather, the improvements have caused regular flooding on plaintiff's land, including … law); see also Ross, 222 N.J. at 505, 510 ("Our courts have adopted the standard of Restatement section 822 to 12 …