-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3630-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RENEE D. EDWARDS, a/k/a RENE C. EDWARDS, WILLIE DALLAS, WILLIE DALLZ and WILLIE DALIZ, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… jointly Haas and Alter, was required for certain business decisions. The record reflects that Alter took charge of the … was not actively participating in the business, and that decisions had to be made without his approval for the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5428-15T2 DOROTHY M. SALAS, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and NASH LAW FIRM, LLC, Respondents. _________________________ Submitted December 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… directly attributable to the actions of the [e]mployer, the decisions . . . to disqualify [claimant] from receiving …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4719-15T4 LAURICE A. FAHERTY, n/k/a LAURICE A. GRAE-HAUCK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SCOTT L. FAHERTY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________ Argued August 1, 2017 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… 141 N.J. 292, 317 (1995)). A trial court's purely legal decisions, however, are subject to our plenary review. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1930-19 JULIO PINA-CATENA, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted March 24, 2021 – Decided April 21, 2021 Before Judges Rose and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5271-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. REGINALD L. LEACH, a/k/a ALVIN BARINO, BUCKY, ESDORN EDWARDS, LAMONT EDWARDS, TOMMY LEACH, RASHEEN, and JERMAINE ROBERTS, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0403-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ADONIS SEPULVEDA, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted February 10, 2021 – Decided May 18, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2657-19 IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN CLANCY, SHERIFF'S OFFICER (S9999R), BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. ___________________________ Submitted August 2, 2021 – Decided August 13, 2021 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3079-19 R.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 8, 2021 – Decided July 29, 2021 …
-
njcourts.gov
… discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). We review decisions to proceed without an evidentiary hearing for …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4366-16T1 IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM PEPPARD, COUNTY POLICE SERGEANT (PC5095N), BERGEN COUNTY. _____________________________ Submitted September 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Rose. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2565-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MATTHEW DRUMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. Argued August 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Gooden Brown. On appeal from Superior …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5570-14T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE TENURE CHARGES AGAINST JOSE ORTIZ-BATISTA, PROFESSOR, COUNTY COLLEGE OF MORRIS ____________________________________ Argued May 24, 2017 – Decided Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3131-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTHONY MAY, a/k/a TONY MAY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted May 7, 2025 – Decided May 29, 2025 Before Judges Rose …
-
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0811-21 JASPER FRAZIER, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 14, 2023 – Decided August 8, 2023 Before Judges Rose and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1680-22 PATRICK PANTUSCO, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Argued March 5, 2024 – Decided March 13, 2024 Before Judges Haas and Natali. …
njcourts.gov
… jurors are fully informed of the consequences of their decisions. (pp. 16-17) The decision of the trial court is … because of the discretion inherent in prosecutors’ charging decisions. See, e.g., State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Court, … jurors are fully informed of the consequences of their decisions. V. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the …