njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1852-18T4 SITE ENTERPRISES, INC., … in the amount of the work, services or material they have provided, and for which they have not been paid." Thomas Grp., Inc. v. Wharton Senior …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1852-18T4 SITE ENTERPRISES, INC., … in the amount of the work, services or material they have provided, and for which they have not been paid." Thomas Grp., Inc. v. Wharton Senior …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER …
-
njcourts.gov
ATL L 000173-20 02/09/2022 Pg 1 of 15 Trans ID: LCV2022582112 ATL-L-000173-20 02/03/2022 5:21:54 PM Pg 1 of 15 Trans ID: LCV2022504362 David R. Kott- N.J. Attorney ID #018131977 McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street, P.O. Box 652 …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN c~ PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER … States; and it is 5. FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cohen shall have all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the …
-
A-1648-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Superior Court Of New Jersey APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. ______________________________ THE STATE … Moon v. Warren Haven Nursing Home, 182 N.J. 507 … in the 1 The Statement of Facts and Procedural History have been combined for clarity. 2 References are as follows: …
-
A-3235-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket No.: A-3235-22 THE ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE … of the MLUL, which expressly requires the public to have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses on all … “Members of the board of adjustment and the board attorney have the right to question the applicant and all witnesses …
-
A-0427-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… – REDACTED VERSION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. INDICTMENT NO. 24-01-134 STATE OF NEW … what occurred in Union County and what is alleged to have occurred in Hudson County. Mr. Sanford’s presence in … whatever non-propensity relevance these accusations have, of which the defense asserts are none. POINT III THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.s.c. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 630 Civil Action MASTER … State of New York, and it fu1ther appearing that Defendants have requested Richard T. Bernardo, Esquire to represent …
-
A-3647-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION APP. DIV. DOCKET NO: A-3647-23 MIDDLESEX COUNTY … may be conducted without a warrant if “(1) the police have probable cause to believe the vehicle contains evidence … Otherwise, “the inherent mobility of the vehicle would have no connection with a police officer not procuring a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1316-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … the opportunity to appear remotely for his deposition, have petitioner's attendance be remote, change the … It has never been the way I operate. 19 A-1316-22 . . . . I have been on it, like I said, for a year and a half. And I …
-
A-4095-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket No.: A-4095-23 THE ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE … example, as to the shade trees, Defendants argue it would have created a hardship because of a conflict with utility lines. This would have applied to any property with similar frontage. There …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … On his application, J.L.B. answered "no" to the question, "Have you ever been attended, treated, or observed by any … text message to her teacher reading: "I want to die" and "I have spent four days with dad, and four days with mom, and I …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0740-24 ABDEL KARIM DANDIS, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, Docket No. LT-004328-24. Bastarrika … a notice terminating the lease. The notice stated, "You have continued to use the premises in violation of your …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0858-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Miller Resentencing for Juveniles Sentenced for Murder Who Have Served [Twenty] Years. See[] State v. Comer, 249 N.J. … for which the jury acquitted defendant. To the extent we have not specifically addressed any of defendant's remaining …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0883-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to Judge Toto. Defendant argues: POINT I SUPPRESSION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE THE WARRANT AFFIDAVIT FAILED TO … was faulty and the evidence seized pursuant to it should have been suppressed. However, the warrant also specifically …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1146-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … court's "opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … on the record and entitled to our deference. Therefore, we have no reason to disturb his conclusion that the totality …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1884-22 M.P.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protection. We affirm. I. The parties are married and have two minor children, K.P. and S.P. They lived … harassment. Ibid. (quoting H.E.S, 175 N.J. at 321). As we have previously addressed in the context of a domestic …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0678-23 511 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINUM … in this matter" and asserted "a simple e[]mail would have sufficed." Defendant further contended his motion was … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case." …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1995-23 CAROL SAYERS, … unexplained length of time . . . to do what in law should have been done." Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. … judgment in its November 17, 2023 order. For the reasons we have already set forth, the trial court's findings were …