njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1611-19T3 COMMERCIAL SPACE, LLC, … [he] made" to the settlement agreement, "the checks should have been rejected or returned." Defendants' counsel … a default and expiration of a fifteen-day cure period. We have no reason to question plaintiff's counsel's …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0686-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … were charged with multiple crimes related to those acts. We have provided a detailed description of the facts and some … was insufficient probable cause to support the warrant. We have explained the reasons for that ruling in a separate …
-
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Dwight M. Nelson (A-60-17) … with intent to distribute. On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed but stated that “the use of the canine unit … by [the] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the “feel” of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1611-19T3 COMMERCIAL SPACE, LLC, … [he] made" to the settlement agreement, "the checks should have been rejected or returned." Defendants' counsel … a default and expiration of a fifteen-day cure period. We have no reason to question plaintiff's counsel's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0686-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … were charged with multiple crimes related to those acts. We have provided a detailed description of the facts and some … was insufficient probable cause to support the warrant. We have explained the reasons for that ruling in a separate …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0901-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to plea counsel, "but for the pandemic, [defendant] would have been brought over to court" and his guilty pleas would have been entered. In view of the pandemic, however, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… appear to be inadvertent/incorrect. 3 A nearly identical provision of the Freeze Act’s application to final Tax Court … County, 30 N.J. Tax 240, 252 (Tax 2017) (“in order to have a final judgment as to the value of the property, one or both parties would have to proffer evidence regarding their conclusion of fair …
-
njcourts.gov
… • nr.lVi,'ANo, J.s.c. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 291 MASTER DOCKET NO.: … after completion of plaintiff expert depositions. These provisions may be modified by agreement of the parties or … fail to timely comply with this section of the Order may have their complaint dismissed with prejudice. 3. Liaison …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2309-19 800 SYLVAN AVENUE LLC, … for the property. The entire property was required to have 1,776 spaces, but plaintiff was proposing a total of … when our decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy.'" Redd …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3050-20 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT, INC., t/a … Id. at 121 (quoting Bosland, 197 N.J. at 557). "Our courts have been careful to constrain the CFA to 'fraudulent, … during which the . . . [party awarded fees] is found to have been earlier entitled." [Ibid. (quoting Rova Farms …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2038-21 A-3312-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:43-26(b)(1), "the prosecutor shall have the sole discretion to determine if an eligible … not relevant to this appeal, the prosecutor shall have the sole discretion to determine if an eligible …
-
A-25-25 Respondent's Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Land Use Regulation Docket No. 091188 Appellate Division Docket No. A-0804-23 Civil Action: On Petition for … the Matthews test to govern these determinations, it would have said so explicitly.' (Pt10). Accordingly, the Appellate … the Matthews test to govern these determinations, it would have said so explicitly.' (Pt10). Thus, the court sensibly …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … neither the Borrower nor A-1778-11T4 10 the Guarantors have satisfied the indebtedness and it remains unpaid, due, … a better contract for the parties, or to supply terms that have not been agreed upon." Graziano v. Grant, 326 N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0701-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHALLENGE … Furthermore, municipal 7 A-0701-22 representatives have been invited to and regularly attend both. Meadowlands … This deference "stems from the recognition that agencies have the 9 A-0701-22 specialized expertise necessary to …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1693-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … motion for resentencing. Defendant argued the judge should have applied mitigating factor fourteen 6 A-1693-21 … Division's affirmance of my denial of your PCR, you should have made an application to appeal the Appellate Division. …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1635-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, … harm that threatens the child's health and will likely have continuing deleterious effects on the child." N.J. Div. …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0804-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … The court said that "concerns around P.S.'s mental health have persisted since the time of B.S.'s birth." 3. The court … of standby counsel. Defendant now claims she should not have been permitted to represent herself because before the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0210-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the case, nor put defendant in a position where he would have to testify to counteract an adverse inference about his … respect the jury's verdict unless no reasonable jury could have reached it. Afanador, supra, 134 N.J. at 178. "Where …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4042-15T2 C.P.B.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, … following: "IS THIS A PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE CASE? IF YOU HAVE CHECKED 'YES' SEE N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27 AND APPLICABLE … If there is any deficiency in the affidavit, plaintiff will have to the end of the 120-day time period to conform the …
default
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … and various accessories, and that the premises would have seating areas where customers could smoke tobacco … interference with plaintiffs' business. Because we have held as a matter of law that the Smoking Ordinance was …