-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4524-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ORAINE D. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted September 28, 2021 – Decided October 12, 2021 Before Judges Currier …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0193-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONOVAN LITTLE, a/k/a TERRELL GREEN, DONOVAN TERRELL BROOKLYN, DONOVAN DAVIS, and VICTOR LITTLE, Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3629-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DENARD C. TRAPP, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted June 7, 2021 – Decided July 15, 2021 Before Judges Currier and …
-
njcourts.gov
… complex where defendant resides. Among other alleged violations, plaintiff charged defendant with breaching her …
-
njcourts.gov
… for the absence on December 21. Because of those two prior violations, the County charged Diaz with a "step 3" …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5456-16T4 SOMERSET COUNTY VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN VINGARA, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Argued October 11, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2412-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. VINCENT BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted March 20, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Gilson and Mayer. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2932-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NOEL NIEVES, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted April 23, 2024 – Decided May 13, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3467-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH VIZCAYA, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued October 15, 2025 – Decided December 29, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and …
njcourts.gov
CHARGE 5.31A ― Page 1 of 1 5.31A Duty of Care At Intersection Approached by Emergency Vehicle (To Be Used If Emergency Vehicle Is Involved) (Approved 1977) While proceeding through an intersection, the driver favored with the right to proceed may not …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3137-21 LAURA GERMINARIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTWOOD REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION, RAYMOND GONZALEZ, individually, and THOMAS CONROY, individually, Defendants-Respondents, and LAUREN …
njcourts.gov
… agreed to voluntarily dismiss counts four (alleging RICO violations), five (RICO criminal conspiracy), and six (RICO … chose to prosecute New Jerseyans more aggressively for violations of federal marijuana laws. The CSA expressly …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1195-22 C.E. and B.E., Individually and on behalf of, K.E., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ELIZABETH PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT and …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2350-17T2 A-2352-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. L.M.A. and A.C., Defendants-Appellants. ——————————————— IN THE MATTER OF …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1338-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.J.R.,1 Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued telephonically September 22, 2020 — Decided September …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-3199-18 A-3926-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WAYNE E. MEYERS, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted February 8, 2021 – Decided March 18, 2021 Before Judges …
njcourts.gov
… possessed handgun after stopping him for motor- vehicle violations. But the stop was no coincidence. Police had … because they had reasonable suspicion of motor-vehicle violations. Specifically, they observed Mesadieu turn …
njcourts.gov
… distinguished less egregious, though no less intentional, violations of standards of care — such as "driving 5 miles …
njcourts.gov
… proper jury instructions. Those claims are based on alleged violations of defendant's constitutional rights during the …
njcourts.gov
… Fee Reporting Form."5 DEP ordered Raritan to cure these violations. The AONOCAPA assessed an aggregate civil … in favor of DEP, finding that "Raritan [was] liable for violations of the Spill Act, the Brownfield Act, the SRRA, … "the ALJ correctly concluded that Raritan is liable for violations of the Spill Act, the Brownfield Act, SRRA, and …