-
njcourts.gov
… motion . . . the presumption of validity remains in the case through the close of all proofs,” MSGW, 18 N.J. Tax at … should predominate depends upon the facts of the particular case and the reaction to these facts by the experts.” …
-
njcourts.gov
… uses that include business and professional offices, research laboratories, select industrial and manufacturing … of correctness at the close of [the challenging party’s] case-in-chief, the burden of proof remain[s] on the … should predominate depends upon the facts of the particular case and the reaction to these facts by the experts.” …
-
njcourts.gov
… in and to the property to CMMI, a nonprofit cancer research organization. 357 N.J. Super. at 45. The court … The court explained that the unique circumstances of the case of associations and corporations organized exclusively … requirement is satisfied by allowing for exemption in such cases, at least where the owner remains a public entity.” …
-
njcourts.gov
… the presumption of correctness at the close of plaintiff’s case-in-chief, the burden of proof remain[s] on the … should predominate depends upon the facts of the particular case and the reaction to these facts by 11 the experts.” … of comparison for a given appraisal through market research and [to] support those conclusions with market …
-
njcourts.gov
… States headquarters housing administrative offices and research and development operations. A. 2014 Tax Year On June … his name and real property and the income therefrom, in the case of income-producing property, and produce his title … the intent of our Legislature in enacting Chapter 91, and case law offering insight into the statutory text of Chapter …
-
njcourts.gov
… Inc., 197 N.J. 543, 554 (2009). -4- The issue in this case is whether the transportation services provided by … one exemption or two, the outcome under the facts of this case is the same. 13 For completeness, there is a fifth …
-
njcourts.gov
… contends the refund claim was not raised timely. 1 That case was Amtopp Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, Docket No. … plaintiff’s settlement offer, stated: In the court case AmTopp v. Director, Division of Taxation 012139- 2012, …
-
njcourts.gov
… this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. November 6, 2017 July 16, 2020 …
-
njcourts.gov
… to CITICORP LEASING, LLC Defendant. 2 I. Statement of the Case Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Fairview … Div. 1977). Defendant therefore argues that a prima facie case for judgment as a matter of law has been established …
-
njcourts.gov
… C- 0023-16 (Law Div. 2017). 5 For consistency, the remanded cases should be assigned to the same judge. A-4664-16T1 7 … about: ADP's operations, products, and services; research and development of ADP products and services; . . . … information. 9 Two different trial judges handled these six cases. One judge considered and ruled in Kusins, DeMarco, …
-
njcourts.gov
… lacks sufficient credibility to add weight to Michael's case. Bland could not remember when she began working for … court regarded the primacy and nearness of relationships in cases involving decisions regarding burial and concluded …
-
A-0366-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… WAS CONTRARY TO A ROBUST BODY OF THE COMMISSION’S OWN CASELAW; WAS ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS, AND UNREASONABLE; AND … April 16, 2024, A-000366-23, AMENDED TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Angus v. Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Metuchen, 475 N.J. … matter is contrary to a robust body of the Commission’s own caselaw, does not comport with the evidence in the record, …
-
A-0367-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… WAS CONTRARY TO A ROBUST BODY OF THE COMMISSION’S OWN CASELAW; WAS A R B I T R A R Y , C A P R I C I O U S , A N D … April 16, 2024, A-000367-23, AMENDED TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Angus v. Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Metuchen, 475 N.J. … matter is contrary to a robust body of the Commission’s own caselaw, does not comport with the evidence in the record, …
-
A-1368-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… 06, 2024, A-001368-23 - iv - TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Allgor v. Travelers Ins. Co., 280 N.J. Super. 254 … 1 - Preliminary Statement The Defendants-Appellants in this case, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (collectively …
-
A-2067-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… 2024, A-002067-23, AMENDED iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Dep’t. of the Pub. Advocate v. N.J. Board of Pub. … Appellate Division, June 07, 2024, A-002067-23, AMENDED 23 case they would have violated the parties’ settlement …
-
A-3602-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… DA-9a Opinion of June 15, 2023 DA-la TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Allstate Redevelopment Corp. v. Summit Assocs., 206 … DA-1a TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Allstate Redevelopment Corp. v. Summit Assocs., 206 …
-
A-0608-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Division, May 24, 2024, A-000608-23 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITY Cases Allstars Auto. Grp., Inc. v. N.J. Motor Vehicle … are mounted to a structure that floats on water, in this case the dredge pond left over from sand mining. Benefits …
-
njcourts.gov
… rooms are covered under each payment method. In either case, the Contractor must honor the rate charged to the … within 10 business days before the event except in cases of force majeure as dictated within the New Jersey …
-
A-1626-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… August 02, 2023, A-001626-22, AMENDED TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases In re Adoption of Reg'l Affordable Housing Dev. … FIRM:59469656v4 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases In re Adoption of Reg’l Affordable Housing Dev. …
-
A-24-24 Amicus Curiae Brief Seton Hall Law School Center for Social Justice
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Supreme Court, 23 Jun 2025, 089243 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Acoli v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 224 N.J. 213 (2016) … the Board’s process for setting the FET in this and similar cases violates legislative policies. 1. The Parole Act …