-
njcourts.gov
… broad powers to decide issues of fact and law, and their decisions "are given collateral estoppel effect by reviewing …
-
njcourts.gov
… children and believes that it is his prerogative to make decisions for the children, based on what he believes is in … don't expand as they had thought, or they make business decisions. But I didn't see anything . . . [that] the … sole legal custody has the sole authority to make the major decisions on behalf of the children. See Pascale v. Pascale, …
-
njcourts.gov
… proceeded past Harkcom's motion; as such we reverse the decisions by the ALJ and the Commission removing him from …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3273-17T4 CHARLES SWEET, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted October 28, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Natali. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0227-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAWN JACKSON, a/k/a RA'ZULU S. UKAWABUTU, and SEAN JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted October 7, 2019 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2399-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WAYNE KACZOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted April 11, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Geiger. On …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3043-16T2 R.K., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. P.M., Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued May 30, 2018 – Decided June 25, 2018 Before Judges Moynihan and Natali. …
-
njcourts.gov
… decided several years after Wiese, notes the "conflicting decisions found in our trial and appellate courts express a …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3381-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEGWIN CLARKE, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued September 17, 2024 – Decided October 11, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0705-23 66 KINDERKAMACK, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF ORADELL ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted January 13, 2025 – Decided May 5, …
-
njcourts.gov
… judges is the same de novo standard applicable to legal decisions in other cases. Amzler v. Amzler, 463 N.J. Super. … made" and supply "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions that counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… agree the code is not pertinent to the TRC's or the DEP's decisions in this matter. Jersey Shore has not argued the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1567-23 IN THE MATTER OF RICKIE DOOLEY, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. __________________________ Submitted September 24, 2025 – Decided October 17, 2025 Before …
-
A-35-24 Supplemental Respondent Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… standards, respectively, and affirmed the TRC's decisions. The Appellate Division properly held that the TRC … Division's decision was erroneous or that the TRC' s decisions were ultra vires, or "arbitrary, capricious, or …
-
njcourts.gov
… cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-0228-23 Following adverse decisions on his pretrial motions, defendant Jason French …
-
njcourts.gov
… of validity is afforded to the Department's plans and decisions in that domain," In re Route 66, 477 N.J. Super …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2076-22 IVY HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KAREEM MUHAMMAD KANEEF TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant, and KARIM TUCKER, KARISMAH TUCKER, KAREEMAH TUCKER, JACK CORREIA, UNION COUNTY BOARD OF …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3923-22 IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH DEMARCO, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. _____________________________ Submitted December 18, 2024 – Decided March 26, 2025 Before Judges …
-
A-15-24 Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… PRESENTMENT POWER. The Diocese attempts to defend the decisions below, but it cannot jusitfy either of their broad … misconduct (Op14) confirms the weight and breadth of the decisions below—and thus the need for review. First, the … 255 N.J. at 79. The Diocese supplies nothing, before the decisions below, endorsing this categorical limitation. 3 So …
-
njcourts.gov
… not a trial judge's statement of reasons or written decisions. See Do-Wop Corp. v. City of Rahway, 168 N.J. 191, … taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion."); …