-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3794-19 LIGIA RIZESCU and TIMOTHY KING, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Respondent. … filed a petition for bankruptcy. Apparently plaintiffs have not obtained any payments through the bankruptcy …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-0754-15T1 A-0808-15T1 PENN NATIONAL … (A-0808-15). The appeals were argued back-to-back, and we have consolidated them now to issue a single opinion. As to … did not personally obtain the lists, but rather two of his employees did. He never received any affirmative assurances …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4669-15T2 STATEWIDE INSURANCE FUND, as subrogee of the COUNTY OF WARREN, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1137-22 SAM MIKHAIL, on behalf of … a group of automobile repair shops under which the shops have agreed to charge fixed labor rates and comply with … negotiate reasonable rates with them. They also assert that employees and representatives of NJM have steered customers …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3235-17T3 THE CHURCH INSURANCE COMPANY OF VERMONT, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 14, 2017. The judge found, however, that plaintiff should have known its complaint had no merit as of November 14, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3094-17T2 DIANE DECKER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0830-15T3 MUNOZ TRUCKING CORP., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KNIGHTBROOK INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. … the parties in the above matter that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2371-21 JUSTIN ZIMMERMAN, ACTING … responsible for the insurance-related conduct of their employees and agents." The ALJ concluded "there [we]re no … and accompanying regulations as charged in the OTSC, and have failed to present any legally or factually viable …
-
njcourts.gov
… F-Disp-4(rev 9/06) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION JOSEPH H. ORLANDO CLERK JOHN K. GRANT DEPUTY CLERK … LARRY WELENC, ON BEHALF OF ANGELINE T. WELENC V. STATE-WIDE INSURANCE CO. DOCKET: NO. A-4348-15 OPINION FILED: August 2, … please substitute the enclosed copy of the opinion. If you have any questions, please contact the Clerk's Office at …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2887-18T1 CHURCHILL CORPORATE SERVICES, … of defendant's policy and concluded that plaintiff did not have a legal obligation to pay Vornado and therefore … was responsible for the fire. It added that Supreme Clean's employees were the last individuals in the unit before the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4319-19 DOMENICO MASUCCI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … against any indemnity or contribution claims that have been or may be brought by any person, firm or …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … LEONARD YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY, … the entire controversy doctrine (ECD) which should have precluded the District from prosecuting the tenure …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2101-19 FREDERICK MILLER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and USAA PROPERTY … and USAA each cross-moved for summary judgment seeking to have the other declared responsible for PIP and UM benefits. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0170-15T1 SCHULTZ FURRIERS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Respondent. … Expense section of the insurance policy, defendant would have been obligated to pay for actual loss of business …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2401-18T2 MELVIN REID and MARYLYNN REID, … Radcliffebivins was operating was insured by the Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) with $20,000 in … 233 N.J. Super. 271, 277 (App. Div. 1989)). 2 The parties have not included the declarations sheet to the NJM policy …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1411-19 ULISSA POKHAN, … was delivered by ACCURSO, J.A.D. This is the second time we have considered an appeal relating to State Farm's … as the affidavits of three individuals — two State Farm employees, an investigator and an underwriter, and the head …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5393-16T4 NORMA BLANCO-SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERSONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … be cleaning the roads that day and called plaintiff to have her car moved to avoid getting a ticket. At the time, …
-
default
… to e-file any documents that require a fee are required to have a Judiciary charge account or “JACS Account”. eCourts … New Jersey municipality in a Tax Appeal case but you do not have a JACS account, you may require authorization from the … jacssupport.mbx@njcourts.gov . The e-filing of Criminal Division motions and motion-related documents does not require …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, … Court in its summary remand order of May 19, 2017, we have reviewed our earlier unreported decision in this …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0120-23 JAMES W. DABNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … and against the [a]ssociation . . . . The decision to have new counsel withdraw filings that had put Malovany and …