-
njcourts.gov
… We affirm. Our "capacity to review administrative agency decisions is limited." Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4052-14T3 DERRICK SMITH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CLARIBEL ALVERIO, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted December 6, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… We are mindful that our review of administrative agency decisions is limited. We will not disturb an agency's action …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2049-17T3 EDWARD G. CAICEDO, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and ROAST ROSTER COFFEE, MSBS INC., Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted January 9, 2019 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… an Unconscionable Practice Under the CFA. B. Recent Decisions in New Jersey Provide Support for the Principle …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0938-22 CHRISTOPHER BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIEANNE DYAS, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted April 23, 2024 – Decided May 8, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and …
-
njcourts.gov
A. Matthew Boxer, Esq., David P. Anderson, Jr., Karen Kessler and Paul J. Walker dissenting: We respectfully disagree with the decision by the Committee to dismiss these complaints at this stage and not initiate formal proceedings. In our view, this type …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1947-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EMMANUEL J. LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued October 7, 2025 – Decided December 11, 2025 Before Judges Gooden …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3979-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.M., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted February 28, 2023 – Decided April 26, 2023 Before Judges Messano, Gilson and …
njcourts.gov
… The CO also stated, a "[c]ourt [o]rder with all binding decisions and the parties' signatures shall be presented to …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2642-21 CHERIE MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued June 20, 2023 – Decided August …
njcourts.gov
… Fugnitti should be terminated. Again, the employment decisions belonged to the Chief and the Borough. The Chief …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0084-24 JAMES WHELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REMA TIP TOP/NORTH AMERICA, INC., REMA TIP TOP OF AMERICA, INC., REMA TIP TOP AG, OLAFUR GUNNARSSON, MICHAEL ÜBELACKER, and STAHLGRUBER OTTO …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2728-20 A-2729-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.T. and C.J., Defendants-Appellants. _________________________ IN THE MATTER …
njcourts.gov
… to appoint a discovery master. 12 A-0499-18 Discovery decisions are discretionary. Capital Health Sys., Inc. v. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1075-18T2 4 WATCHUNG AVENUE, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM and THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM, Defendants-Appellants/ …
njcourts.gov
… Son, LLC, 246 N.J. 157, 171 (2021). We also review de novo decisions regarding questions of law involving preclusionary … and final disposition through the avoidance of piecemeal decisions; (2) fairness to parties to the action and those …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2728-20 A-2729-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.T. and C.J., Defendants-Appellants. _________________________ IN THE MATTER …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1075-18T2 4 WATCHUNG AVENUE, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM and THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM, Defendants-Appellants/ …
-
njcourts.gov
… to appoint a discovery master. 12 A-0499-18 Discovery decisions are discretionary. Capital Health Sys., Inc. v. …