-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2506-20 ADAM FOX, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and U.S. NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL HEAD, MILITARY CORRESPONDENCE PERS-312. Respondents. _____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Division seeking such repayment, nor in the subsequent decisions from the Appeal Tribunal and Board, because of … record, the Division's determination, and the subsequent decisions on appeal, were not "arbitrary, capricious or …
-
njcourts.gov
… legislative policies animating the fund. The Commission's decisions were not 14 A-0839-20 arbitrary, capricious, or …
-
njcourts.gov
… court was struck throughout the trial by how many financial decisions of the S&Ps favored Shah-owned interests at the … S&Ps and Patel's interest in the business. At every turn decisions were unfair to Patel. Defendants tried to counter … by various arguments directed at Patel's knowledge of the decisions and ratification of them. It remained difficult …
-
njcourts.gov
… may then be appealed to the Tax Court, which reviews such decisions de novo. Ibid.; N.J.S.A. 2B:13-3. However, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Rule 2:4-1(b) states that appeals must be taken from final decisions or actions of state administrative agencies within … applies to an administrative "agency's quasi-judicial decisions that adjudicate the rights of a particular …
-
njcourts.gov
… court has jurisdiction, a question never fairly resolved. Decisions regarding Rule 4:50-1(f) motions are reviewed for … made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2854-17T1 LYNN D. WESLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted February 13, 2019 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… N.J. 366, 378 (1995) (citations omitted). We review such decisions de novo. 30 River Court E. Urban Renewal Co. v. … for the reasons the trial court expressed in its written decisions. We defer to the court's factual determinations, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4608-12T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARCELIN FAISON, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________________________ Argued October 18, 2016 – Decided Before …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2825-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALTURIK FRANCIS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted October 31, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Gilson and Mayer. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4010-19 ALEX ROSA, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Argued November 29, 2021 – Decided December 20, 2021 Before Judges Messano, Accurso …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3559-17T4 M.H., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents-Respondents. ______________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0317-18T1 ALEXANDER FERRIS, an infant, by his GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MELISSA FERRIS, and SEAN FERRIS and MELISSA FERRIS, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AIDA BLANCO-ALQUACIL, AFFINITY CARE …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2502-17T2 M.S. WHOLESALE PLUMBING, INC., on behalf of itself and all other entities and persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GEN-KAL PIPE & STEEL, CORPORATION and EUGENE J. …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5358-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.C., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October 4, 2018 – Decided February 8, 2019 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3530-15T2 D.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.C., Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued December 18, 2018 – Decided February 7, 2019 Before Judges Fisher, Geiger …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0883-16T2 FRANCES J. RUSSO, as Executor of the Estate of ROSEMARY PELLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVAN A. FRIEDRICH, M.D., Defendant-Respondent, and ENGLEWOOD ENDOSCOPIC ASSOCIATES, and …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1600-17T1 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A CHILD BY C.M.C. _____________________________ Submitted September 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Rothstadt and Gilson. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… Inadequate Respect to Defendant's Right to Make Critical Decisions Regarding the Conduct of His Own Trial. POINT II …