-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0390-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RASHEEM WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted October 10, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Gilson. …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Zoning Officer's, and the Construction Official's decisions. Judge Mendez agreed with the "Zoning Board's …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0902-22 IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE MEADOWS, PATERSON, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. ____________________________ Submitted September 24, 2024 – Decided October 16, 2024 Before Judges Perez …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1527-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RONALD J. KRIER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued June 4, 2025 – Decided June 27, 2025 Before Judges Rose and Puglisi. …
-
njcourts.gov
… October 23, 2023, Judge Noah Franzblau issued two written decisions granting Progressive's motions for summary … Two October 23, 2023 orders memorialized the judge's decisions granting summary judgment to Progressive and his … Judge Franzblau in his thorough and well-reasoned written decisions. Allstate made no convincing argument we should …
-
njcourts.gov
… views espoused in M.W. and Grandovic, but we find our prior decisions inapposite to what occurred in the present matter, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1659-23 CENTURION COMPANIES, INC. and CENTURION CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. GALLEN CONTRACTING, INC., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Submitted April 30, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0619-22 ANTHONY DIMAURO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONROE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD and LIDL U.S. OPERATIONS, LLC, Defendants-Respondents. ___________________________ Argued December 5, 2023 – …
default
… conduct a meaningful appellate review of Judge Scoca's decisions. See R. 2:6-1(a)(1)(I) (appellant's appendix must … the certification that was critical to Judge Scoca's decisions in both of these cases. In addition, appellant's … factual findings, we perceive no abuse of discretion in her decisions, and if we considered the merits, we would affirm …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4439-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTHONY PARISI-SANCHEZ, a/k/a ANTHONY PARISI, ANTHONY J. PARISI, ANTHONY M. PARISI, and ANTHONY SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3987-16T3 IN RE THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION OF MERRITT CARR. ____________________________ Argued April 23, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior Court of New …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2286-16T3 SHARON J. BOONE, Claimant-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LSA VENTURES, LLC, Respondents-Respondents. _____________________________ Submitted March 21, 2018 – …
njcourts.gov
… Tribunal opinion. Our review of administrative agency decisions is limited in scope. Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2687-15T4 SHAWN JULY, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted June 8, 2017 – Decided July 11, 2017 Before Judges Lihotz and …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4273-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.S., Defendant-Appellant, and M.F., Defendant. _________________________________ IN …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0797-16T4 CALVIN BASS, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Submitted March 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Carroll and Mawla. On appeal from the New Jersey …
njcourts.gov
… court is limited in its review of administrative agency decisions. Brady v. Bd. of Rev., 152 N.J. 197, 210 (1997). …
-
njcourts.gov
… conduct a meaningful appellate review of Judge Scoca's decisions. See R. 2:6-1(a)(1)(I) (appellant's appendix must … the certification that was critical to Judge Scoca's decisions in both of these cases. In addition, appellant's … factual findings, we perceive no abuse of discretion in her decisions, and if we considered the merits, we would affirm …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4273-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.S., Defendant-Appellant, and M.F., Defendant. _________________________________ IN …
-
njcourts.gov
… issues, gather the information they need to make informed decisions, and communicate so that they can find a solution …