-
njcourts.gov
… V). Therefore, the scope of appellate review of the Board's decisions is "limited." Hare v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 368 …
default
… the Board issued a final decision, affirming both panels' decisions. Dixon thereafter appealed from the Board's … of Kerri Cody, a Board member who participated in the decisions of the three-member panel and the full Board. See … its reasons for doing so with references to the panels' decisions. The Board cited Dixon's "responses to questions …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Board issued a final decision, affirming both panels' decisions. Dixon thereafter appealed from the Board's … of Kerri Cody, a Board member who participated in the decisions of the three-member panel and the full Board. See … its reasons for doing so with references to the panels' decisions. The Board cited Dixon's "responses to questions …
njcourts.gov
… for requesting a hearing to challenge any of the Board's decisions on March 14, 2016 or September 14, 2016. The Board … March 26, 2018 administrative appeal of the Board's 2016 decisions was not filed within forty- five days of the decisions and "that neither out of time appeal has provided …
-
njcourts.gov
… for requesting a hearing to challenge any of the Board's decisions on March 14, 2016 or September 14, 2016. The Board … March 26, 2018 administrative appeal of the Board's 2016 decisions was not filed within forty- five days of the decisions and "that neither out of time appeal has provided …
-
njcourts.gov
… to the Appellate Division as of right . . . to review final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or … 5:35-1.4(a). However, the LGEL states specifically that LFB decisions are appealable in the same way as other agency decisions. N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9. An appeal to our court from …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4344-15T4 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 469, AN UNINCORPORATED LABOR ORGANIZATION AND ROBERT YAK, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. STAFFORD TOWNSHIP AND MAYOR, TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATOR AND ELECTED OFFICIALS …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4344-15T4 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 469, AN UNINCORPORATED LABOR ORGANIZATION AND ROBERT YAK, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. STAFFORD TOWNSHIP AND MAYOR, TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATOR AND ELECTED OFFICIALS …
njcourts.gov
… a ninety-six-month FET. Sabatini appealed both panel decisions to the full Board. On May 31, 2017, the Board issued a final decision affirming the decisions of both panels. We vacated the Board's May 31, … the legislative intent with respect to well-founded decisions to release inmates on parole, and amount to an …
-
njcourts.gov
… a ninety-six-month FET. Sabatini appealed both panel decisions to the full Board. On May 31, 2017, the Board issued a final decision affirming the decisions of both panels. We vacated the Board's May 31, … the legislative intent with respect to well-founded decisions to release inmates on parole, and amount to an …
default
… is limited to three questions: (1) whether the decisions are consistent with the agency's governing law and policy; (2) whether the decisions are supported by substantial evidence in the … in applying the law to the facts, the agency reached decisions that can be viewed as reasonable. In re Adoption …
-
njcourts.gov
… is limited to three questions: (1) whether the decisions are consistent with the agency's governing law and policy; (2) whether the decisions are supported by substantial evidence in the … in applying the law to the facts, the agency reached decisions that can be viewed as reasonable. In re Adoption …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1560-24 HOWARD ZLOTKIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted January 28, 2026 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1560-24 HOWARD ZLOTKIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted January 28, 2026 – Decided …
default
… 1 The dates we refer to are the "mailing dates" for the decisions of the Board and the Appeal Tribunal. 2 The Board, … 25, 2017 decision. Our review of administrative agency decisions is limited. Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 The dates we refer to are the "mailing dates" for the decisions of the Board and the Appeal Tribunal. 2 The Board, … 25, 2017 decision. Our review of administrative agency decisions is limited. Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, …
njcourts.gov
… November 30, 2018, January 16, 2019 and January 29, 2019 decisions, as indicated on the [CIS], you must submit an Amended [NOA] adding those decisions." On June 4, 2019, Davis's counsel filed an … Board's final decision of January 29, 2019, as one of the decisions he was appealing. The Board argues, however, that …
-
njcourts.gov
… November 30, 2018, January 16, 2019 and January 29, 2019 decisions, as indicated on the [CIS], you must submit an Amended [NOA] adding those decisions." On June 4, 2019, Davis's counsel filed an … Board's final decision of January 29, 2019, as one of the decisions he was appealing. The Board argues, however, that …
njcourts.gov
… on December 10, 2018.2 Velazquez appealed from the Board's decisions. In its final agency determination, the Division …
-
njcourts.gov
… on December 10, 2018.2 Velazquez appealed from the Board's decisions. In its final agency determination, the Division …