Filters
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2940-22 ANTHONY BERARDI and JANET BERARDI, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. FMI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and LOYAS AGENCY, … filed a motion for summary judgment in which it sought to have plaintiffs' declaratory judgment complaint dismissed. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2037-22 MARLINE ROMHEN, and IBRAHIM MIRKHAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FRANKLIN MUTUAL INSURANCE, INC., Defendant-Respondent. … 180 N.J. at 563). Our Court Rules, from their inception, have been understood as "a means to the end of obtaining …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2833-14T4 ROB K. CONSTRUCTION & COMPANY, … exclusion of coverage for injuries to contractors and employees of contractors. We disagree and affirm. 3 … if he had workers on the job site[,] and they wouldn't have placed it with Rutgers. Judge Schultz also noted that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4860-15T1 M&S WASTE SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRAETORIAN INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Respondent, and RICHARD LECOMTE and … relating to the acceptance of late premium payments not to have 3 A-4860-15T1 been "addressed and eliminated" by the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2678-20 TMN, LLC, GIACCIO LLC, and NJ … RITA'S WATER ICE), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … had not been for the Executive Orders, the plaintiffs would have been able to continue functioning with their intended …
- Notice - Board on Continuing Legal Education - Attorneys Deleted from the 2024 CLE Ineligible List (Having Been Erroneously Included) Notices to the Barnjcourts.gov › notices to the bar… that the New Jersey attorneys identified below should not have been included in the Continuing Legal Education List of … ineligibility was effective October 21, 2024, and therefore have had no period of administrative ineligibility. … - Attorneys Deleted from the 2024 CLE Ineligible List (Having Been Erroneously Included) …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0978-21 HUDSON REGIONAL HOSPITAL, on … in New York for their New York employers. The patients have no connection to New Jersey other than having received … it did not have jurisdiction over the claims of New York employees of New York employers who were injured at work in …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1593-20 INSURANCE RESTORATION … complaint against Travelers, several principals and employees of Restoration, and others. They alleged … that the court had overlooked material evidence, or should have considered new information. 2 The Perezes sought to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2343-21 CHILD T.R.C., a minor, by his … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRISON IN DISTRICT DAY SCHOOL, HARRISON BOARD OF EDUCATION, TOWN OF HARRISON, and … than not, . . . sustained a permanent injury that will have permanent residual sequelae." He further noted, "there …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2717-17T3 DIACO CONSTRUCTION, INC., … GRADE CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Argued December 5, … be defective, deficient, inadequate or dangerous; or b. You have failed to fulfill the terms of a contract or agreement; …
- njcourts.gov… OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COUNTY LAW DIVISION DOCKET NO. L-000610-15 FRANK CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Decided: March 28, 2019 John …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-0754-15T1 A-0808-15T1 PENN NATIONAL … (A-0808-15). The appeals were argued back-to-back, and we have consolidated them now to issue a single opinion. As to … did not personally obtain the lists, but rather two of his employees did. He never received any affirmative assurances …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3794-19 LIGIA RIZESCU and TIMOTHY KING, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Respondent. … filed a petition for bankruptcy. Apparently plaintiffs have not obtained any payments through the bankruptcy …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4669-15T2 STATEWIDE INSURANCE FUND, as subrogee of the COUNTY OF WARREN, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1137-22 SAM MIKHAIL, on behalf of … a group of automobile repair shops under which the shops have agreed to charge fixed labor rates and comply with … negotiate reasonable rates with them. They also assert that employees and representatives of NJM have steered customers …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3235-17T3 THE CHURCH INSURANCE COMPANY OF VERMONT, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 14, 2017. The judge found, however, that plaintiff should have known its complaint had no merit as of November 14, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2371-21 JUSTIN ZIMMERMAN, ACTING … responsible for the insurance-related conduct of their employees and agents." The ALJ concluded "there [we]re no … and accompanying regulations as charged in the OTSC, and have failed to present any legally or factually viable …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3094-17T2 DIANE DECKER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0830-15T3 MUNOZ TRUCKING CORP., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KNIGHTBROOK INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. … the parties in the above matter that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2887-18T1 CHURCHILL CORPORATE SERVICES, … of defendant's policy and concluded that plaintiff did not have a legal obligation to pay Vornado and therefore … was responsible for the fire. It added that Supreme Clean's employees were the last individuals in the unit before the …