-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5577-15T2 JESSE ROSENBLUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, Defendant-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued January 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Rose. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… erred by concluding that there could be no bad faith or CFA violations once he determined that Selective properly …
-
njcourts.gov
… The police did not charge her with any criminal violations. However, the Division was notified, and placed …
-
njcourts.gov
… history, the memorandum notes he pled guilty to seventeen violations between 1998 and 2012, was adjudicated guilty of three more violations, had his license suspended on seven occasions, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1116-19 MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CO. LLC T/A BORGATA Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RONALD LENOWITZ, Defendant-Appellant, and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.1, Respondent. ______________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3841-16T1 TBF FINANCIAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT PICCIANO, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATEGIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INC. and PIERRE GUZMAN, Third-Party …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3789-16T1 YOLANDA CRUZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________________ Argued May 14, 2018 – Decided June 13, 2018 …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1369-22 N.T., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.T., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted May 7, 2024 – Decided May 21, 2024 Before Judges Mayer and Whipple. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0743-23 IN THE MATTER OF PBA LOCAL 29, Petitioner-Appellant, and TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, Respondent-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued April 9, 2024 – Decided May 15, 2024 Before …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5538-13T4 A-1020-14T4 A-4572-14T4 A-5442-14T4 JOSEPHINE PENZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT PENZA, Defendant-Respondent. Argued November 30, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Accurso. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5538-13T4 A-1020-14T4 A-4572-14T4 A-5442-14T4 JOSEPHINE PENZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT PENZA, Defendant-Respondent. Argued November 30, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Accurso. …
njcourts.gov
… of laws that the Supreme Court identified as ex post facto violations in Carmell. The State argues that the text …
njcourts.gov
… $1.8 million in compensatory damages for her employer’s violations of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination … And, noting that the maximum civil penalty for LAD violations is limited to $50,000, the court inferred from … of punitive damages against public entities for LAD violations were addressed, in some measure, by the …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of any …
njcourts.gov
… later. Notwithstanding that we did not find due process violations requiring reversal because of the extraordinary …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2572-20 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY PROSECUTORS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY, …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION - GENERAL EQUITY ESSEX COUNTY DOCKET NO.: ESX-C-122-13 _________________________________ : COTY US LLC, : : Plaintiff : O P I N I O N : …