njcourts.gov
… to review either the summary judgment or reconsideration decisions, we reverse the trial court's denial of …
njcourts.gov
… is limited. In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 27 (2007). Decisions by an agency will be upheld, unless the decision …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4927-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHANNON P. GREGORY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted December 11, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0055-16T2 LEONEL SERIO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FIDELITY & GUARANTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC. d/b/a TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. _______________________________ …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0670-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TIECE RIDDICK, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted January 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from Superior Court …
default
… 571, 579-80 (1980)). Furthermore, "'when reviewing agency decisions, we defer to matters that lie within the special …
default
… this appeal followed. Our review of administrative agency decisions is limited. Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0342-15T4 EDWARD L. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted October 16, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On …
default
… the reasons stated in the thorough, cogent, and thoughtful decisions rendered by the Honorable James J. DeLuca, J.S.C., …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1802-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN P. RINCK, a/k/a STEVEN PAUL RINCK, and STEVEN RINCK, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted March 21, 2022 – …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3437-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHARLES RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 14, 2022 – Decided June 8, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino and …
njcourts.gov
… We will not second guess trial counsel's strategic decisions, and without more, trial counsel's 5 A-4571-18T4 … must avoid second-guessing defense counsel's tactical decisions and viewing those decisions under the 'distorting effects of hindsight.'" …
njcourts.gov
… reasons expressed by Judge Fiamingo in her thorough written decisions addressing the summary judgment and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1863-18T3 PC II REO, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JERILEAN ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant, and MR. ROBERTS, spouse of JERILEAN ROBERTS, ANDREWS FEDERAL CREDIT UNTION, s/b/m/t MCGUIRE FEDERAL …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2554-19T1 4C4 MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKELAND BANK, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted December 14, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Susswein. On …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2236-19 WILLIAM NORIEGA, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and YRC, INC., Respondents. __________________________ Argued September 30, 2021 – Decided October 14, 2021 Before …
njcourts.gov
… In support of her arguments, plaintiff cites out-of-state decisions interpreting the FDCPA. We note "decisions of the federal courts of appeals are not binding … of federal constitutional law and statutory law, only decisions of the United States Supreme Court are binding on …
njcourts.gov
… requires trial courts, when ruling on motions, to issue decisions that include both the facts at issue and legal …
-
njcourts.gov
… the reasons stated in the thorough, cogent, and thoughtful decisions rendered by the Honorable James J. DeLuca, J.S.C., …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3437-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHARLES RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 14, 2022 – Decided June 8, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino and …