-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1382-20 J.E.B.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.B., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted January 18, 2022 – Decided January 31, 2022 Before Judges Vernoia and …
-
njcourts.gov
… trial courts] should articulate their reasons for their decisions with specific reference to the Yarbough factors." … prerequisite for adequate appellate review of sentencing decisions . . . [in order to] determine whether the trial …
-
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4705-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LUIS E. GAMBOA-APARICIO, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted November 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and …
-
njcourts.gov
… has now decided the issue, holding that its Cain and Simms1 decisions were "intended to apply prospectively to guide … not retroactively to proceedings conducted prior to those decisions." State v. Covil, __ N.J. __, __ (Jan. 22, 2020) … defendant's trial occurred in 2014, prior to the Court's decisions in Cain and Simms, so defendant is not entitled to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2513-23 S.D.S.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.H., Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued February 26, 2025 – Decided April 3, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Puglisi. On appeal from …
-
njcourts.gov
… a letter pursuant to Rule 2:6-11(d), citing two recent decisions by this court. He argues, similar to our decision …
-
njcourts.gov
… courts have a 'limited role' in the review of [Commission] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) … 19, 33 (2007)). 16 A-1537-22 Further, deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2485-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PASCAL EXILUS, a/k/a PASCEL EXILUS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted December 20, 2023 – Decided January 23, 2024 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3010-21 K.O., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, and MORRIS COUNTY OFFICE OF TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE, Respondents-Respondents. ___________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… . . . may at 5 The Commission sought to "clarify its prior decisions" because factual issues arose regarding its …
-
njcourts.gov
… procedural history and the arguments raised in view of our decisions in State v. Pero, 370 N.J. Super. 203 (App. Div. … the legislative desire for uniformity." Ibid. Citing our decisions in State v. Martelli, 201 N.J. Super. 378 (1985), …
-
njcourts.gov
… We review questions of law and statutory interpretation decisions de novo. Cardali, 255 N.J. at 107. We find no …
njcourts.gov
… “[w]e apply no different standards on appeal to suppression decisions made by Family Part judges as opposed to Criminal …
njcourts.gov
… approve each and every permit application. NJDEP's permit decisions are based on NJDEP's interpretation of its own … access to navigable waters." In our view, the TRC's decisions here were within the statute and its established …
njcourts.gov
… for the 33% formula and to set forth reasons for those decisions. Our remand is not intended to preclude the judge … of pendente lite support must be "consider[ed]" when making decisions as to alimony. The trial court did so here, making …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2418-19 COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and ROBERT AUSTINO in his official capacity as Sheriff of County of Cumberland, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 299, …
njcourts.gov
… in original)). We review a court's "pretrial detention decisions under the [CJRA]" under an abuse of discretion … findings and explain its reasons" when making detention decisions under the CJRA. State v. C.W., 449 N.J. Super. … in the second. The lack of findings supporting the court's decisions requires that we vacate the court 's order and …
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… in original)). We review a court's "pretrial detention decisions under the [CJRA]" under an abuse of discretion … findings and explain its reasons" when making detention decisions under the CJRA. State v. C.W., 449 N.J. Super. … in the second. The lack of findings supporting the court's decisions requires that we vacate the court 's order and …