-
njcourts.gov
… 17, 2019 2 A-4432-16T4 administrative appeal of the termination of his employment by the City of Union City (the … his motion for reconsideration. We affirm. Prior to his termination, petitioner held the position of "Laborer 1" … principles, we conclude that the Commission's decisions are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record. R. …
-
njcourts.gov
… earlier judge denied defendant's initial motion for alimony termination based upon his retirement, yet reduced his … his retirement constitutes a changed circumstance requiring termination of his alimony. This statute provides that "the … its function of deciding whether the determination below is supported by substantial credible proof on the whole …
njcourts.gov
… pleaded guilty to third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(b)(5)(b), stemming from his possession of child pornography, and fourth-degree violation of the … DEFENDANT, AND BY FINDING AGGRAVATING FACTORS THAT WERE UNSUPPORTED BY FACTS IN THE RECORD [NOT RAISED BELOW]. POINT …
-
njcourts.gov
… pleaded guilty to third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(b)(5)(b), stemming from his possession of child pornography, and fourth-degree violation of the … DEFENDANT, AND BY FINDING AGGRAVATING FACTORS THAT WERE UNSUPPORTED BY FACTS IN THE RECORD [NOT RAISED BELOW]. POINT …
default
… (count one); second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a) (count two); and second-degree … N.J.R.E. 803(c)(27). In reviewing a trial court's determination regarding the admissibility of a child's … findings are entitled to deference" as long as they are "supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record." …
-
njcourts.gov
… (count one); second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a) (count two); and second-degree … N.J.R.E. 803(c)(27). In reviewing a trial court's determination regarding the admissibility of a child's … findings are entitled to deference" as long as they are "supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record." …
njcourts.gov
… PVSC advised Agrawal it would recommend his 3 A-4152-17T2 termination. His potential termination was to be considered at an executive session in … 79 (App. Div. 1985)). "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, [we] are obliged …
-
njcourts.gov
… PVSC advised Agrawal it would recommend his 3 A-4152-17T2 termination. His potential termination was to be considered at an executive session in … 79 (App. Div. 1985)). "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, [we] are obliged …
njcourts.gov
… We affirm the denial because her conviction for child endangerment under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a) is not subject … 2C:39-5(b) and third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a). She was sentenced to three-years … to the expungement statute prior to its 2016 amendment to support her argument that non-sexual child endangerment …
-
njcourts.gov
… We affirm the denial because her conviction for child endangerment under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a) is not subject … 2C:39-5(b) and third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a). She was sentenced to three-years … to the expungement statute prior to its 2016 amendment to support her argument that non-sexual child endangerment …
default
… of action. As noted, plaintiff claimed that her employment termination violated the LAD because it was based on either … She thus contends that the reason articulated for her termination – that two years later she filled out a … health insurance plan or whether the evidence could support a factfinder's determination that this reason was a …
-
njcourts.gov
… of action. As noted, plaintiff claimed that her employment termination violated the LAD because it was based on either … She thus contends that the reason articulated for her termination – that two years later she filled out a … health insurance plan or whether the evidence could support a factfinder's determination that this reason was a …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0585-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Defendant admitted to a worker from the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Division) that she hated … the record, we conclude that Judge DeCastro's decision is supported by substantial credible 4 A-0585-15T1 evidence. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Practice Division at 609-815-2900, ext. 55350 Family - Children in Court - Change in Terminology: Renaming … revisions to the terminology used for hearings in Children in Court (CIC) matters in child protection matters … Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P) to work together to support families involved in the child welfare system. The …
njcourts.gov
… the trial court failed to set forth the reasons for its determination as required under Rule 1:7-4, we reverse and … on March 3, 2023 addressing parenting time, custody and child support issues related to the parties' child.1 Defendant …
default
… seventeen years of marriage and have three unemancipated children. There is a litigious, post-judgment motion history … expenses for the oldest child, re-calculation of child support, and counsel fees. The October 17 order was entered … include findings of facts and conclusions of law for each determination they make. Compliance with Rule 1:7-4 is crucial …
-
njcourts.gov
… seventeen years of marriage and have three unemancipated children. There is a litigious, post-judgment motion history … expenses for the oldest child, re-calculation of child support, and counsel fees. The October 17 order was entered … include findings of facts and conclusions of law for each determination they make. Compliance with Rule 1:7-4 is crucial …
-
njcourts.gov
… the trial court failed to set forth the reasons for its determination as required under Rule 1:7-4, we reverse and … on March 3, 2023 addressing parenting time, custody and child support issues related to the parties' child.1 Defendant …
njcourts.gov
… the law requires that a will expressly name disinherited children, in order to be effective. We have found no support for that assertion, and Marsh provides none. Rather, the omission of disinherited children's names in a will is at best, circumstantial …
-
njcourts.gov
… the law requires that a will expressly name disinherited children, in order to be effective. We have found no support for that assertion, and Marsh provides none. Rather, the omission of disinherited children's names in a will is at best, circumstantial …