-
njcourts.gov
… we ordinarily recognize in reviewing final administrative decisions. See H.K. v. State of N.J. Dep't of Hum. Servs., …
njcourts.gov
… the legislative "mandate[] that judicial review of PERC's decisions and orders shall be of a very limited scope." …
njcourts.gov
… its original decision. The primary difference between the decisions was the addition of a "reason[] for denial": "lack … Baxter appealed the two- and three-member Board panels' decisions to the full Board. Among other things, Baxter … had failed to consider material facts and had based their decisions on facts not supported by the record, the Board …
-
njcourts.gov
… its original decision. The primary difference between the decisions was the addition of a "reason[] for denial": "lack … Baxter appealed the two- and three-member Board panels' decisions to the full Board. Among other things, Baxter … had failed to consider material facts and had based their decisions on facts not supported by the record, the Board …
-
njcourts.gov
… the legislative "mandate[] that judicial review of PERC's decisions and orders shall be of a very limited scope." …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1306-19 JAMIE B. TRUNCELLITO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST, BERGEN COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent. Submitted November 8, 2021 – Decided January 24, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1306-19 JAMIE B. TRUNCELLITO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST, BERGEN COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent. Submitted November 8, 2021 – Decided January 24, …
njcourts.gov
… that this court overturned three previous administrative decisions of the DEP in this litigation. In each of those …
-
njcourts.gov
… that this court overturned three previous administrative decisions of the DEP in this litigation. In each of those …
njcourts.gov
… the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) appeal from final decisions by the State Parole Board (Board) denying their … the consideration of parole, rather than make disclosure decisions on a case-by- case basis as contemplated in … the record before us, and the Board asserts its disclosure decisions are made in accordance with Thompson. The limited …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) appeal from final decisions by the State Parole Board (Board) denying their … the consideration of parole, rather than make disclosure decisions on a case-by- case basis as contemplated in … the record before us, and the Board asserts its disclosure decisions are made in accordance with Thompson. The limited …
njcourts.gov
… to properly respond to the HIB allegations. After receiving decisions in these cases, plaintiffs filed a series of … procedures." N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) provides: "I will make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children … N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) (compelling Board members to "make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children …
-
njcourts.gov
… to properly respond to the HIB allegations. After receiving decisions in these cases, plaintiffs filed a series of … procedures." N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) provides: "I will make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children … N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) (compelling Board members to "make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children …
njcourts.gov
… The history of this case is fully recounted in our prior decisions and need not be fully repeated here. In sum, … reconsideration, objecting to fourteen of the twenty-one decisions rendered. On February 4, 2014, the court denied … subject to an . . . infinite number of challenges to the decisions of the [c]ourt." He held the denial of defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… The history of this case is fully recounted in our prior decisions and need not be fully repeated here. In sum, … reconsideration, objecting to fourteen of the twenty-one decisions rendered. On February 4, 2014, the court denied … subject to an . . . infinite number of challenges to the decisions of the [c]ourt." He held the denial of defendant's …
-
A-22-24 Appellant Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
FILED, Clerk of the Appellate Division, July 24, 2023, A-003489-21 FILED, Clerk of the Supreme Court, 23 Sep 2024, 089370 PHILIP D. MURPHY Governor SHEILA Y. OLIVER Lt. Governor STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY POLICE AND FIREMEN'S …
njcourts.gov
… made. Although we have a limited role in reviewing agency decisions, we are not permitted to rubber stamp decisions that do not have an articulated rational basis. …
-
njcourts.gov
… made. Although we have a limited role in reviewing agency decisions, we are not permitted to rubber stamp decisions that do not have an articulated rational basis. …
-
A-26-24 Respondent Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… importance, conflict with other appellate or Supreme Court decisions, or otherwise implicate the interest of justice. … 2A:24-7. As such, arbitration awards are not final agency decisions, as defined at N.J.A.C. 1:1-2.1. In contrast, the … this logic, because there were no conflicting final agency decisions, the doctrines of comity or agency privity do not …
njcourts.gov
… as well as N.J.A.C. 6A:28-6.4(a)(5) and prior agency decisions. Persi v. Woska, No. A-6038-11 (App. Div. Dec. 11, … "[We] have 'a limited role' in the review of [agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). "[A] … Woska did not address whether the SEC's or Commissioner's decisions that he violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(e) by his …