njcourts.gov
… the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) appeal from final decisions by the State Parole Board (Board) denying their … the consideration of parole, rather than make disclosure decisions on a case-by- case basis as contemplated in … the record before us, and the Board asserts its disclosure decisions are made in accordance with Thompson. The limited …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) appeal from final decisions by the State Parole Board (Board) denying their … the consideration of parole, rather than make disclosure decisions on a case-by- case basis as contemplated in … the record before us, and the Board asserts its disclosure decisions are made in accordance with Thompson. The limited …
njcourts.gov
… to properly respond to the HIB allegations. After receiving decisions in these cases, plaintiffs filed a series of … procedures." N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) provides: "I will make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children … N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) (compelling Board members to "make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children …
-
njcourts.gov
… to properly respond to the HIB allegations. After receiving decisions in these cases, plaintiffs filed a series of … procedures." N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) provides: "I will make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children … N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(b) (compelling Board members to "make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children …
njcourts.gov
… The history of this case is fully recounted in our prior decisions and need not be fully repeated here. In sum, … reconsideration, objecting to fourteen of the twenty-one decisions rendered. On February 4, 2014, the court denied … subject to an . . . infinite number of challenges to the decisions of the [c]ourt." He held the denial of defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… The history of this case is fully recounted in our prior decisions and need not be fully repeated here. In sum, … reconsideration, objecting to fourteen of the twenty-one decisions rendered. On February 4, 2014, the court denied … subject to an . . . infinite number of challenges to the decisions of the [c]ourt." He held the denial of defendant's …
-
A-22-24 Appellant Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
FILED, Clerk of the Appellate Division, July 24, 2023, A-003489-21 FILED, Clerk of the Supreme Court, 23 Sep 2024, 089370 PHILIP D. MURPHY Governor SHEILA Y. OLIVER Lt. Governor STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY POLICE AND FIREMEN'S …
-
A-26-24 Respondent Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… importance, conflict with other appellate or Supreme Court decisions, or otherwise implicate the interest of justice. … 2A:24-7. As such, arbitration awards are not final agency decisions, as defined at N.J.A.C. 1:1-2.1. In contrast, the … this logic, because there were no conflicting final agency decisions, the doctrines of comity or agency privity do not …
njcourts.gov
… as well as N.J.A.C. 6A:28-6.4(a)(5) and prior agency decisions. Persi v. Woska, No. A-6038-11 (App. Div. Dec. 11, … "[We] have 'a limited role' in the review of [agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). "[A] … Woska did not address whether the SEC's or Commissioner's decisions that he violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(e) by his …
-
njcourts.gov
… as well as N.J.A.C. 6A:28-6.4(a)(5) and prior agency decisions. Persi v. Woska, No. A-6038-11 (App. Div. Dec. 11, … "[We] have 'a limited role' in the review of [agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). "[A] … Woska did not address whether the SEC's or Commissioner's decisions that he violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(e) by his …
njcourts.gov
… made. Although we have a limited role in reviewing agency decisions, we are not permitted to rubber stamp decisions that do not have an articulated rational basis. …
-
njcourts.gov
… made. Although we have a limited role in reviewing agency decisions, we are not permitted to rubber stamp decisions that do not have an articulated rational basis. …
-
njcourts.gov
… unrelated people of different genders. In making its hiring decisions, RYNJ would consider religion, whether the … . . . so what is excessive entanglement in ecclesiastical decisions? If we're talking about . . . an admitted minister … prohibits government involvement in such ecclesiastical decisions. [Id. at 188-89.] A-2650-20 19 The Court further …
-
A-0534-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-000534-24 SHAKIR KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Respondent. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION On Appeal from a Final Decision of the New Jersey State Parole Board …
njcourts.gov
… and standards used in their review of classification decisions. Id. at 11-12. The Administrator's rejection of … standards, and authority of COC to review custody decisions did not put Norman on notice of what appears to be …
-
njcourts.gov
… and standards used in their review of classification decisions. Id. at 11-12. The Administrator's rejection of … standards, and authority of COC to review custody decisions did not put Norman on notice of what appears to be …
default
… 1:1-18.8(f) ("Extensions for filing initial or final decisions may not exceed [forty-five] days from the original … each may be granted only for good cause shown. For final decisions, the order must additionally state that unanimous … Because we found the Racing Commission's failure to issue decisions to be inexcusable neglect or gross indifference to …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1:1-18.8(f) ("Extensions for filing initial or final decisions may not exceed [forty-five] days from the original … each may be granted only for good cause shown. For final decisions, the order must additionally state that unanimous … Because we found the Racing Commission's failure to issue decisions to be inexcusable neglect or gross indifference to …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1387-18T3 ROBERT HANKINS, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ______________________ Submitted December 19, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. On appeal from …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1387-18T3 ROBERT HANKINS, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ______________________ Submitted December 19, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. On appeal from …