njcourts.gov
… the court did not adequately explain the reasons for its decisions and did not provide findings of fact and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2236-21 R.R.,1 Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ___________________ Submitted February 8, 2023 – Decided March 29, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Firko. On appeal from …
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
njcourts.gov
… in the judge's July 9, 2021, and August 12, 2021 written decisions. In denying plaintiff's motion to re-open and …
njcourts.gov
… the procedural history of the case and its prior decisions, the court noted it had already "concluded that no … that the function of an appellate court is to review the decisions of the trial court, rather than to decide …
default
… must overcome the presumption that' the attorney's decisions followed a sound strategic approach to the case." …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0746-13T4 VALERIE GIARUSSO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM G. GIARUSSO, SR., Defendant-Respondent. _________________________________ Submitted May 2, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez, …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5390-16T1 K.D.E., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.E., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued October 1, 2018 – Decided October 12, 2018 Before Judges Sabatino and Haas. On appeal …
njcourts.gov
… the offense." N.J.S.A. 2C:2-11(c). There are no published decisions that apply the de minimis statute to a prosecution …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1963-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ASHTON FUNK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted January 25, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0627-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. R.N., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE …
njcourts.gov
… DISCRETION BY DENYING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO REVISIT THE DECISIONS ON THE MIRANDA AND SEVERANCE OF OFFENSES MOTIONS. … court's ruling on the post-trial motions, we affirmed its decisions to admit defendant's statements and to sever the … most commonly applies to the binding nature of appellate decisions upon a trial court if the matter is remanded for …
njcourts.gov
… recognized a competent defendant's ultimate right to reject decisions of his attorney or the trial court to pursue an …
njcourts.gov
… 1963)). "This standard applies equally to the trial court's decisions regarding alimony [and] child support . . . ." …
njcourts.gov
… must include "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
default
… 1963)). "This standard applies equally to the trial court's decisions regarding alimony [and] child support . . . ." …
default
… intra-agency and inter-agency statements; and (3) agency decisions and findings in contested cases." Ibid. A-3155-19 …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2639-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M.M. Defendant-Appellant, and R.C. Defendant. _________________________ IN THE MATTER OF …
default
… of E.R. and "has greater autonomy over the day-to-day decisions with the child." In his memorandum and order, the … "the legal authority and responsibility for making 'major' decisions regarding the child's welfare," not "minor day-to-day decisions." Beck [v. Beck], 86 N.J. [480], 487 [(1981)]. …
njcourts.gov
… circumstances. We have reviewed the trial court's written decisions granting summary judgment and denying … policy application warranting recission of the policy. The decisions clearly reveal the court based its determination …