default
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-15T1 A-0033-16T1 THERESA WEAR and RICHARD WEAR, Plaintiffs/Intervenors- Appellants, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0490-22 JAMES WARNET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF BERGENFIELD, Defendant-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued September 18, 2024 – Decided August 22, 2025 Before Judges …
njcourts.gov
… made greater or more severe — then you must make two more decisions. You will see that these appear as questions … You may be wondering why you have to make all of these decisions and how they may affect the final outcome of this … verdict sheet, you can see that you are making two separate decisions about fault. The first one is as to the cause of …
-
njcourts.gov
… not a trial judge's statement of reasons or written decisions. See Do-Wop Corp. v. City of Rahway, 168 N.J. 191, … taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion."); …
-
njcourts.gov
1 Appendix XXIX-C Note: Adopted July 27, 2015 to be effective September 1, 2015. Introductory Note: The Supreme Court of New Jersey endorses the use of arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution processes for the resolution of disputes. Parties …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4617-17T4 DAVID WEINMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. LAURA WEINMAN, n/k/a LAURA WEINMAN-TRICHON, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued …
-
njcourts.gov
… than an earlier date, as detailed in its oral and written decisions, satisfy Rule 1:7-4, and are amply supported by …
-
njcourts.gov
… to the trial court's attention "matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-15T1 A-0033-16T1 THERESA WEAR and RICHARD WEAR, Plaintiffs/Intervenors- Appellants, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, …
-
A-22-24 Petition For Certification
Briefs
njcourts.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO.: 089370 KEITH ISAAC (deceased), v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: A-003489-21 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ON APPEAL FROM A FINAL …
-
njcourts.gov
… appeals. In general, judicial review of administrative decisions is limited. We review only "(1) whether . . . the … as to the judicial review of the BPU's final agency decisions, we recognize the breadth of the BPU's …
-
njcourts.gov
… deprive the incapacitated person of the right to make all decisions. The primary duty of the attorney for an AIP is to … protect their client’s rights, including the right to make decisions on specific matters. Ordinarily, an attorney should abide by the client’s decisions concerning the objectives of representation, and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1528-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSHUA A. TOLIVER, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted September 14, 2023 – Decided October 20, 2023 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… Court developed the Solari/Whitmyer test, based on its decisions in Solari Indus., Inc. v. Malady, 55 N.J. 571, 576 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0490-22 JAMES WARNET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF BERGENFIELD, Defendant-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued September 18, 2024 – Decided August 22, 2025 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… final approval. 20 A-3372-23 We review municipal-board decisions under "the same standard as the trial court." … that "discovery not be had," Rule 4:10-3(a). We review such decisions for abuse of discretion. Bender v. Adelson, 187 …
DePuy ASR Hip Implant
Multi County Litigation
njcourts.gov
DePuy ASR hip implants, made by DePuy Orthopaedics, were recalled in 2010 after high failure rates. Ongoing litigations for damages are centrally managed in Bergen County, NJ.
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5751-09T3 MANSOUR JANAKAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METAL CUTTING CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ …
njcourts.gov
… or deny an FRO, "we accord great deference to discretionary decisions of Family Part judges," Milne v. Goldenberg, 428 …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5106-17T3 ANDRE JONES, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted June 18, 2019 – Decided July 8, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz and …