njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS PJSC ARMADA and ARSENAL ADVISOR LTD., Plaintiffs, v. ALEXY KUZOVKIN, ALLA ROITMAN, YEFIM ROITMAN, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – BERGEN …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0781-22 SUPREME ELASTIC CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALTER SCHULEIN, and UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC., Defendants-Respondents. ___________________________ Submitted December 12, 2023 – …
njcourts.gov
… of "employer," and they are subject to liability for NJLAD violations to the same extent as private entities. N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2476-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ZAHIR D. MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued November 7, 2024 – Decided December 2, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, …
njcourts.gov
… In the absence of evidence of procedural due process violations, given the deference we must accord to the … factor." The OPD petition anticipated two possible violations of this principle. First, the OPD argued the …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2918-15T4 ANDREW FREY, ALEX BADAMO, and RALPH EUSEBIO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and SAMUEL TORRES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, LOCAL 1078 HOBOKEN FIREFIGHTERS, and MATTHEW MARKEY, Local 1078 …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2049-14T2 ALFRED J. PETIT-CLAIR, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Argued January 8, 2018 – Decided Before Judges …
njcourts.gov
… REGARDING THE FORCIBLE BLOOD DRAW. POINT II DUE TO MIRANDA VIOLATIONS, THE MATTER MUST BE REVERSED AND ALL STATEMENTS …
njcourts.gov
… application to charge the jury on the alleged regulatory violations because Valentine's testimony on such violations was "not particularly clear." Here, the record …
njcourts.gov
… of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violations of section 2 of the Consumer Fraud Act ("CFA"), …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1684-14T2 MARK SMITH and KATHERINE SMITH, Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent. ________________________________ Argued November 2, 2017 – Decided Before …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4339-15T1 REALTY APPRAISAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant. Argued May 17, 2017 – Decided June 13, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0062-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KWADIR FELTON, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued March 2, 2017 – Decided May 4, 2017 Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman …
njcourts.gov
… SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS 1. THE MASSIAH REQUIREMENTS 2. THE VIOLATIONS OF MR. DALAL'S RIGHTS UNDER MASSIAH, THE FIFTH …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0689-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DARREN E. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Argued March 2, 2020 – Decided May 15, 2020 Before Judges Fasciale …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1230-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES COMER, a/k/a JAMES B. COMER, JAMES F. COMER, and JAMESA COMER, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued telephonically …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0508-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONALD WATKINS, a/k/a MICHAEL WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued February 10, 2020 – Decided April 30, 2020 …
njcourts.gov
… wildlife or plant species habitats. As a result of these violations, JSTAR thus argues that the permit must be …