-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
-
njcourts.gov
… it is a valid debt." As to her claims of harassment as violations of the FDCPA, the court noted that plaintiff "did … . . . that would lead the court to believe there have been violations of the FDCPA" and "sending several letters and … with [p]laintiff's claims regarding [Cutolo]'s alleged violations of the FDCPA" and there was "no basis to allow …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2963-18T4 POLINA ROITBURG, Executor of the Estate of DAVID ROITBURG, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. LEONID ROITBURG a/k/a LEON ROITBURG, DESIGN OF TOMORROW, INC. a/k/a EDUCATIONAL and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0689-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DARREN E. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Argued March 2, 2020 – Decided May 15, 2020 Before Judges Fasciale …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1230-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES COMER, a/k/a JAMES B. COMER, JAMES F. COMER, and JAMESA COMER, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued telephonically …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0508-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONALD WATKINS, a/k/a MICHAEL WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued February 10, 2020 – Decided April 30, 2020 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2918-15T4 ANDREW FREY, ALEX BADAMO, and RALPH EUSEBIO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and SAMUEL TORRES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, LOCAL 1078 HOBOKEN FIREFIGHTERS, and MATTHEW MARKEY, Local 1078 …
-
njcourts.gov
… wildlife or plant species habitats. As a result of these violations, JSTAR thus argues that the permit must be …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS PJSC ARMADA and ARSENAL ADVISOR LTD., Plaintiffs, v. ALEXY KUZOVKIN, ALLA ROITMAN, YEFIM ROITMAN, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – BERGEN …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0062-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KWADIR FELTON, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued March 2, 2017 – Decided May 4, 2017 Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman …
-
njcourts.gov
… REGARDING THE FORCIBLE BLOOD DRAW. POINT II DUE TO MIRANDA VIOLATIONS, THE MATTER MUST BE REVERSED AND ALL STATEMENTS …
-
njcourts.gov
… SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS 1. THE MASSIAH REQUIREMENTS 2. THE VIOLATIONS OF MR. DALAL'S RIGHTS UNDER MASSIAH, THE FIFTH …
-
njcourts.gov
… of the suppression hearing indicates that those alleged violations would have been harmless." Id. at 189. Therefore, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2049-14T2 ALFRED J. PETIT-CLAIR, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Argued January 8, 2018 – Decided Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TYRICK MIRANDA, a/k/a MICHAEL GAINES, and TYRICK N. MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued November 6, 2019 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violations of section 2 of the Consumer Fraud Act ("CFA"), …
-
njcourts.gov
… application to charge the jury on the alleged regulatory violations because Valentine's testimony on such violations was "not particularly clear." Here, the record …
-
A-10/11-24 Jersey City United Against the New Ward Map Petition for Certification
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiffs state a claim at the motion-to-dismiss stage for violations of the OPMA when they pleaded factual allegations …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2476-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ZAHIR D. MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued November 7, 2024 – Decided December 2, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, …