default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1151-16T4 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE … those defendants fraudulently, knowingly, and 1 The parties have not included the entire complaint in the record. 6 …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-20 JENKINSON'S SOUTH, INC., and … such dispersal, application, release or exposure may have been caused. Similarly, the Axis primary policies … your premises[.]" 21 A-3644-20 intended purpose and because employees tested positive for COVID-19 at or around the time …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1910-21 WESTFIELD AREA YMCA, YMCA OF … ([n]et [p]rofit or [l]oss before income taxes) that would have been earned or incurred;" and "[c]ontinuing normal … the closure of "[a]ll public, private, and parochial preschool program premises" as well as the closure of all …
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Robert Ferrante v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Group (A-87-16) (078496) Argued January 3, 2018 -- … a jury awarded plaintiff $200,000 in damages, but the Law Division entered a judgment of $100,000 based on the high-low …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… RPC 4.3-Dealing with Unrepresented Person; Employee of Organization RPC 4.3 In dealing on behalf of a … the misunderstanding. If the person is a director, officer, employee, member, shareholder or other constituent of an …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2345-21 A-2365-21 RAFAEL C. RIVERA, … LUIS C. RIVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARSTONE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and WILSHIRE … consolidate. On appeal, plaintiff and 172 First argue they have standing, and that the Starstone's excess coverage …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … amici also assert that the contrary decision in Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Mount Prospect Chiropractic … private parties in an action brought under the Fraud Act have a right to a jury trial "because the [Fraud Act] …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0492-15T1 VINCE A. SICARI, ESQ., … ATTORNEY AT LAW, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Defendant-Respondent, and … the trial court acknowledged Hartford received and should have responded to plaintiff's renewal application, plaintiff …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1968-20 VICTOR ROSARIO, NILDA MALDONADO, … NOEMI FLORES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., and THE WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE CO., … OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. As we have noted: Certificates of insurance do not create or bind …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1731-20 JIAN SHEN, HUI ZHU, and J&H … GROUP, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HYUNDAI MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Respondent. … such by applying the standards in Rule 4:46-1). Plaintiffs have not raised any procedural objection either in the Law …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1102-17T3 LORI-ANNE MICHEL and ERICH H. … MICHEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … providing similar coverage; and c. All such other policies have a limit of liability for similar coverage which is less …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3545-18T2 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMOLO IMPORT AND …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4526-18T3 BOB MEYER COMMUNITIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, … the property damage first becomes known, or when one would have sufficient reason to know of it." 452 N.J. Super. at …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2846-15T4 JULIUS AND EVA SESZTAK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE CO., INC., and WALTER B. HOWE AGENCY, INC., … live at 49 Bedens Brook Road" and that "[w]e 3 A-2846-15T4 have never owned any property which is next to this …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1266-19T1 SELECTIVE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … coverage[.] . . . . Based upon our investigation we have identified certain provisions of the policy which are …
-
njcourts.gov
… of the opinion. Giuseppe Amato v. Township of Ocean School District (A-31-24) (090133) Argued September 25, 2025 … case. The Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … issued guidance as to who should be considered essential employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. OEM adopted CISA’s …
njcourts.gov › notices to the bar
… Court Advisory Committee on Outside Activities of Judiciary Employees ("Advisory Committee") for two year terms … Court Advisory Committee on Outside Activities of Judiciary Employees (“Advisory Committee”) for two-year terms …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3711-20 THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, … or the action is taken to enable a civil authority to have unimpeded access to the damaged property. Pertinent to … in April 2020. On March 24, 2021, plaintiffs furloughed 116 employees due to a "slowdown in business" that they …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3380-16T3 BEAUTY PLUS TRADING COMPANY, … before closing, warehouse managers determined they did not have enough time to unload the container because it would take over an hour to unload, and their employees were "particularly reluctant to work overtime on …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1886-20 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE … granting defendants, attorney Harris Legome, his firm, and employees, summary judgment. We affirm, substantially for … was not available. Further, Allstate alleges Legome may not have done any of the work on particular files 5 A-1886-20 …