njcourts.gov
… doctrine. "Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, decisions of law made in a case should be respected by all … taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, 22 A-2427-24 informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion." …
njcourts.gov
… may warrant "limited appellate review" over trial court decisions in APDRA matters. 154 N.J. at 152 (quoting Tretina …
njcourts.gov
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
… during the proceedings. Accordingly, we affirm these decisions. I. J.A.B. was born in December 2019, prematurely, …
njcourts.gov
… between the parties, including when the educational decisions were made and the efforts made to involve …
njcourts.gov
… 380, 389 (1984). "The standard of review on appeal from decisions on motions for a new trial is the same as that …
njcourts.gov
… 2 In their brief, defendants acknowledge the judge's decisions and rulings were "not achieved via standard …
njcourts.gov
… Division . . . is an autonomous agency and only it can make decisions regarding [Police and Firemen's Retirement System …
njcourts.gov
… 13 A-3330-21 "limited appellate review" over trial court decisions in APDRA matters. 154 N.J. at 152. Appellate … not our role under N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-18(b) to revisit the decisions rendered by the trial court subject to the …
njcourts.gov
… And because Lesko stated she was not "involved with the decisions made about collections and [the] sharing of …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2854-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.B., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1766-22 A-1768-22 A-2268-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAKEEM BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GARY …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1140-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WILLIAM ZAMOR, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted November 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Rothstadt. …
njcourts.gov
… doctrine is a discretionary, non-binding rule, "[p]rior decisions on legal issues should be followed unless there is …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1497-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.L., Defendant-Appellant, and L.Y., Defendant. _____________________________ IN THE …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3560-19 OLGA TCHIKINDAS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BASSER-KAUFMAN MANAGEMENT CORP., BASSER KAUFMAN DEVELOPMENT CORP., BASSER KAUFMAN, INC., BASSER KAUFMAN, BASSER KAUFMAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, …
default
… established" constitutional rights of RDI. The DEP's decisions to pursue regulatory violations against RDI and to …
default
… GRC Complaint No. 2005-99 (July 14, 2005). Because the decisions involve the exact same issue – OPRA requests for … argument, the trial court agreed with the municipalities' decisions not to disclose the dog license records based upon … also relies upon the "logic" of this court's unpublished decisions to support his position that he is entitled to the …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0743-24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.T.,1 Defendant-Respondent, and J.E. and R.W., Defendants. _________________________ IN …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2291-23 A-2336-23 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. B.B., Respondent-Appellant. …