njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2602-22 GLOUCESTER SOLAR I, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued January 16, 2025 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
… 896 (1976). 13 A-1579-23 Our Court has recognized "most decisions have identified a period of one year or slightly …
njcourts.gov
… only to point 16 A-1607-23 out 'the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3650-21 NOE PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted May 1, 2024 – Decided May 15, …
njcourts.gov
… must focus on all aspects of a trial to make important decisions, with the advice of counsel, including which …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1660-22 HALEY H. NEEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTOVER COMPANIES, and WRV APARTMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., d/b/a WILLOW RIDGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS, Defendants-Respondents. …
njcourts.gov
… must avoid second-guessing defense counsel's tactical decisions and viewing those decisions under the 'distorting effects of hindsight.'" …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2832-22 ALIA JITAN, a/k/a ALIA AHMAD HABIBEH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAED ABDULLAH JITAN, Defendant-Appellant. Argued June 4, 2024 – Decided August 1, 2024 Before Judges Rose and Smith. On …
njcourts.gov
… the analysis adopted by the courts in reaching their decisions clearly incorporates an equitable component." …
default
… enrollment." He explained to the DCR that staff assignment decisions were "complicated" and "typically occur[ed] in the … offered in the upcoming school year" and "because those decisions require a balancing of many factors, the District …
default
… "[C]ourts ordinarily should not disturb the discretionary decisions of local boards that are supported by substantial …
default
… parentheticals omitted).] We have applied the doctrine to decisions made by zoning boards of adjustment. See, e.g., …
default
… Div. 1988)). We "accord great deference to discretionary decisions of Family Part judges." Milne v. Goldenberg, 428 … 171 N.J. 561, 571 (2002)). The family judge's legal decisions are subject to this court's plenary review. Crespo …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4778-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. T.U.B., Defendant, and J.E.C., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ IN …
njcourts.gov
… Dr. Akhtar was "not individually responsible for decisions made by the entity."1 In a July 10, 2015 written …
njcourts.gov
… eventually consolidated the three lawsuits and issued decisions favorable to Shipyard in all three cases. These … opinion, we agree that the County and Freeholder Boards' decisions were arbitrary, capricious, inconsistent with the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3898-15T3 SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. IFPTE, LOCAL 196, CHAPTER 2, and JOHN SEGARS, Defendants-Appellants. _______________________________ Argued October 23, …
njcourts.gov
… the June 29, 2016 order did not reflect the court's actual decisions.2 II We accord "great deference to discretionary decisions of Family Part judges," Milne v. Goldenberg, 428 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4869-15T1 STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GILDA NICOLE HARRIS, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Argued April 26, 2018 – …
njcourts.gov
… capacity, zero capacity to make informed intelligent decisions" when defendant claims she made such decisions. The judge found that defendant exercised undue …