-
njcourts.gov
… 6 Appellant administratively appealed the panels' decisions, but on July 27, 2016, the full State Parole Board … N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.10(a). Our standard of review of Board decisions is limited and "grounded in strong public policy … 358-59 (1973)). Our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… (applying the terms of that statute). Previous Parole Board Decisions and Appeals Reldan first became eligible for … wield its discretionary power arbitrarily. Like all agency decisions, those rendered by the Parole Board are subject to … Parole Board does not abuse its discretion in making its decisions." 250 N.J. at 479– 80. The judiciary's function …
-
njcourts.gov
… (applying the terms of that statute). Previous Parole Board Decisions and Appeals Reldan first became eligible for … wield its discretionary power arbitrarily. Like all agency decisions, those rendered by the Parole Board are subject to … Parole Board does not abuse its discretion in making its decisions." 250 N.J. at 479– 80. The judiciary's function …
-
njcourts.gov
… agency” under Rule 2:2-3(a)(2). University Hospital’s decisions and actions may not be directly appealed to the … to the Appellate Division as of right . . . to review final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or … constitutes a “state administrative agency” whose final decisions and actions may be directly appealed to the …
-
A-3876-23/A-3886-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… validity and it is for this court to decide whether those decisions are in accord with the law.” Parsippany-Troy Hills … This is where the ALJ and the Commission erred, because the decisions implausibly conclude that nothing in CREAMMA …
njcourts.gov
… officer's decision.1 This court's authority to review final decisions of a state administrative agency is limited. In re …
-
njcourts.gov
… officer's decision.1 This court's authority to review final decisions of a state administrative agency is limited. In re …
njcourts.gov
… a ninety-six-month FET. Sabatini appealed both panel decisions to the full Board. On May 31, 2017, the Board issued a written decision affirming both panel decisions. This appeal followed. Appellant raised for the …
-
njcourts.gov
… a ninety-six-month FET. Sabatini appealed both panel decisions to the full Board. On May 31, 2017, the Board issued a written decision affirming both panel decisions. This appeal followed. Appellant raised for the …
njcourts.gov
… opinion. See R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). A numerical review of decisions rendered by the CSC in the last two years does not …
-
njcourts.gov
… opinion. See R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). A numerical review of decisions rendered by the CSC in the last two years does not …
njcourts.gov
… relate to two Civil Service Commission (CSC) final agency decisions that reinstated William Able to his position as … twenty-four months. I. To provide context for our decisions, we provide an extended discussion of the … Board's witnesses. We are satisfied that the ALJ and CSC's decisions are fully supported by the record and are not …
-
njcourts.gov
… relate to two Civil Service Commission (CSC) final agency decisions that reinstated William Able to his position as … twenty-four months. I. To provide context for our decisions, we provide an extended discussion of the … Board's witnesses. We are satisfied that the ALJ and CSC's decisions are fully supported by the record and are not …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3376-21 JEFFREY DYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID WILDSTEIN and THE NEW JERSEY GLOBE, Defendants-Respondents. __________________________ Submitted December 12, 2023 – Decided December 18, 2023 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3376-21 JEFFREY DYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID WILDSTEIN and THE NEW JERSEY GLOBE, Defendants-Respondents. __________________________ Submitted December 12, 2023 – Decided December 18, 2023 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2371-21 JUSTIN ZIMMERMAN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. GENEVIEVE STEWARD, BAIL GROUP MANAGEMENT, LLC, and EAST COAST BAIL BONDS, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2371-21 JUSTIN ZIMMERMAN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. GENEVIEVE STEWARD, BAIL GROUP MANAGEMENT, LLC, and EAST COAST BAIL BONDS, …
njcourts.gov
… 10A:9-4.5(a).] 5 A-4221-17T3 Under a separate provision, decisions on an inmate's "custody status . . . and … N.J.A.C. 10A:9-3.3(a). We presume these apply to initial decisions regarding such matters, as well as regular … that a Department brief "explain[ed] that 'custody status' decisions are made by the Institutional Classification …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4675-18T1 G.S., Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, and HUNTERDON COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents. __________________________ Submitted September …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4675-18T1 G.S., Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, and HUNTERDON COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents. __________________________ Submitted September …