-
A-1409-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… intentional, deliberate and malicious. Upon reviewing the decisions of the Board and Hearing Examiner, the exhibits … called for and the Board blindly affirmed. CONCLUSION The decisions of the Board affirming the unwarranted Appeals …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0956-23 MAGDOULEN A. SAWIRES, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondents. _________________________ Submitted December 9, 2024 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0956-23 MAGDOULEN A. SAWIRES, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondents. _________________________ Submitted December 9, 2024 – Decided …
default
… filed her first appeal challenging the Council's 2014 decisions. We affirmed the Council's denial of appellant's … arguments seek to challenge the Council's interim and final decisions issued in 2014. In that regard, she seeks to … submitted any new evidence warranting a reopening of the decisions the Council made in 2014. Accordingly, we conclude …
-
njcourts.gov
… filed her first appeal challenging the Council's 2014 decisions. We affirmed the Council's denial of appellant's … arguments seek to challenge the Council's interim and final decisions issued in 2014. In that regard, she seeks to … submitted any new evidence warranting a reopening of the decisions the Council made in 2014. Accordingly, we conclude …
njcourts.gov
… (applying the terms of that statute). Previous Parole Board Decisions and Appeals Reldan first became eligible for … wield its discretionary power arbitrarily. Like all agency decisions, those rendered by the Parole Board are subject to … Parole Board does not abuse its discretion in making its decisions." 250 N.J. at 479– 80. The judiciary's function …
-
njcourts.gov
… (applying the terms of that statute). Previous Parole Board Decisions and Appeals Reldan first became eligible for … wield its discretionary power arbitrarily. Like all agency decisions, those rendered by the Parole Board are subject to … Parole Board does not abuse its discretion in making its decisions." 250 N.J. at 479– 80. The judiciary's function …
-
njcourts.gov
… agency” under Rule 2:2-3(a)(2). University Hospital’s decisions and actions may not be directly appealed to the … to the Appellate Division as of right . . . to review final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or … constitutes a “state administrative agency” whose final decisions and actions may be directly appealed to the …
-
A-3876-23/A-3886-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… validity and it is for this court to decide whether those decisions are in accord with the law.” Parsippany-Troy Hills … This is where the ALJ and the Commission erred, because the decisions implausibly conclude that nothing in CREAMMA …
njcourts.gov
… 15, 2015 letter. The full Board thereafter affirmed the decisions to deny parole and set an eighty-four-month FET. … standard of review that we apply to administrative agency decisions generally: (1) whether the agency's action …
njcourts.gov
… 6 Appellant administratively appealed the panels' decisions, but on July 27, 2016, the full State Parole Board … N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.10(a). Our standard of review of Board decisions is limited and "grounded in strong public policy … 358-59 (1973)). Our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… principles unique to PTI nonetheless frame the limited decisions a trial court may make at the PTI stage. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… principles unique to PTI nonetheless frame the limited decisions a trial court may make at the PTI stage. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… 15, 2015 letter. The full Board thereafter affirmed the decisions to deny parole and set an eighty-four-month FET. … standard of review that we apply to administrative agency decisions generally: (1) whether the agency's action …
-
njcourts.gov
… 6 Appellant administratively appealed the panels' decisions, but on July 27, 2016, the full State Parole Board … N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.10(a). Our standard of review of Board decisions is limited and "grounded in strong public policy … 358-59 (1973)). Our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
default
… require that we forego a careful review of administrative decisions simply because an agency has exercised its …
njcourts.gov
… . We disagree. Our standard of review of administrative decisions by the Board is limited and "grounded in strong … Consequently, this court "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
… require that we forego a careful review of administrative decisions simply because an agency has exercised its …
-
njcourts.gov
… . We disagree. Our standard of review of administrative decisions by the Board is limited and "grounded in strong … Consequently, this court "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… relate to two Civil Service Commission (CSC) final agency decisions that reinstated William Able to his position as … twenty-four months. I. To provide context for our decisions, we provide an extended discussion of the … Board's witnesses. We are satisfied that the ALJ and CSC's decisions are fully supported by the record and are not …