-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0775-15T4 J.C., Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent. _______________________________ Submitted March 5, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Messano, Accurso and …
-
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
-
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
-
njcourts.gov
… decision on a Rule 4:50-1(f) motion is limited. Such decisions are within the sound discretion of the trial …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0457-19T3 FIRST ATLANTIC FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHAD STRACENSKY, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued telephonically July 28, 2020 – Decided August …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0982-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KENNETH LEWANDOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Submitted November 16, 2020 - Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1452-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEPHEN V. MAURRASSE, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted April 28, 2020 – Decided May 12, 2020 Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3689-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. L.N.G., Defendant, and N.R., Defendant-Appellant. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3493-18T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL RECORDS OF H.M.S. _________________________ Submitted December 9, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and Geiger. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… 188 (App. Div. 1993). Particular deference is afforded to decisions on issues of credibility. Cesare v. Cesare, 154 …
-
njcourts.gov
… by the defendant. In particular, what investigation decisions are reasonable depends critically on such …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1908-16T2 TAMYRA L. COTTMAN, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and QUALITY …
-
njcourts.gov
… Jacobs in his April 12, 2017 and December 20, 2018 oral decisions. We provide the following discussion to amplify … v. Pomianek, 221 N.J. 66, 80 (2015)). In three landmark decisions, the United States Supreme Court relied on …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-19 DERICK VEERDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. _____________________________ Submitted May 11, 2021 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0888-19 NELSON VILLANUEVA, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted April 19, 2021 – Decided May 13, 2021 Before Judges Mayer and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3046-19 ANN CORIGLIANO and MICHAEL CORIGLIANO, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. HENRY CORIGLIANO, JR., individually, and HENRY CORIGLIANO, JR., and JANET M. SANDELLI, as trustees of the testamentary …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5284-17T4 JOHN ARIAS, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________ Argued October 3, 2019 – Decided October 25, 2019 Before Judges Fisher, Gilson, …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. E.P., 196 N.J. 88, 104 (2008)). A judge's purely legal decisions, however, are subject to our plenary review. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1085-17T3 SHIPYARD ASSOCIATES, LP, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, A municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant, and FUND FOR A BETTER WATERFRONT and HUDSON …
-
njcourts.gov
… of this order, including the court's subsequent orders and decisions denying AC's motion to stay release of the funds … adopt [principles]" with widespread impact, and leave such decisions to our Supreme Court. See, e.g., Tannen v. Tannen, …