-
njcourts.gov
… Co. of Am., 142 N.J. 520 (1995), the judge focused on three decisions of this court. First, the judge, relying on …
-
njcourts.gov
CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL : EXCHANGE, : NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff : GLOUCESTER COUNTY v. : LAW DIVISION : CIVIL ACTION- CBLP CASE SUMMIT PHARMACY, INC, et.al. : Docket No. GLO-L-1212-15 Defendants : …
-
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2446-22 TIBOR S. SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOB RUSCH and TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE, Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted May 14, 2024 – Decided May 23, 2024 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
1 NOTICE TO THE BAR ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN ATTORNEY RETAINER AGREEMENTS – ADOPTION OF OFFICIAL COMMENT TO RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 1.4 This notice promulgates the attached Official Comment to Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.4 (“Communication”) as …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant does not challenge the custody and parenting time decisions on appeal. II. Counsel fee determinations, "rest[] …
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional … has not established it would have altered defendant's plea decisions and more specifically that but for counsel's …
njcourts.gov
… for the recognition and enforcement of maintenance decisions.” Hague Convention art. 1. The state or country 9 … is to “facilitate the ongoing enforcement of maintenance decisions, including any arrears.” Hague Convention art. …
njcourts.gov
… 2010). "Our scope 14 A-0604-21 of review of administrative decisions is narrowly circumscribed." Paff v. N.J. Dep't of … interpret OPRA, we apply this deferential standard to its decisions. Id. at 613 (citing N.J.S.A. 47:1A-7(b)). "[T]he …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0435-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARK SETTE, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued December 20, 2022 – Decided January 10, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Rose. …
njcourts.gov
… by the trial court in both its initial and reconsideration decisions. We observe that defendant's assertion that the …
njcourts.gov
… Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998). Zoning board decisions constitute quasi-judicial actions of municipal …
njcourts.gov
… N.J. 14, 27 (2011)). "[A]n appellate court reviews agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0634-23 FRG-X-NJ2, LP, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBMAR REALTY ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted January 23, 2025 – Decided January 31, 2025 Before Judges …
njcourts.gov
… over twenty years. Although we are not bound by our prior decisions, see State v. Harrell, 475 N.J. Super. 545, 564 …
default
… the right to seek judicial review of administrative decisions "inheres not only in those who are direct parties … to the Appellate Division as of right . . . to review final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or …
default
… 384- 85 (2010)). "Appellate review of the trial court's decisions proceeds in the same 12 A-3812-17T3 sequence, with … responders [should] be given leeway to make split second decisions and judgments in the face of imminent risk and …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2388-15T3 JOSE TORRES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. _______________________________ Submitted September 12, 2017 – …
default
… which the GRC granted in two separate April 26, 2016 final decisions. After Carter sought reconsideration of both final decisions, the GRC amended its fee awards but dismissed … the attorney's fees awards in two January 31, 2017 final decisions. Carter does not raise any issues on appeal …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2587-16T2 W.A.D., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. R.M.C.,1 Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Argued September 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Rothstadt and …