njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Oscar Lopez-Carrera (A-8-20) … defendant is an illegal alien.” The Appellate Division consolidated the cases and reversed. See 464 N.J. … Non-citizens who have lived here for years, gone to school here, raised families here, and established roots in …
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Oscar Lopez-Carrera (A-8-20) … defendant is an illegal alien.” The Appellate Division consolidated the cases and reversed. See 464 N.J. … Non-citizens who have lived here for years, gone to school here, raised families here, and established roots in …
-
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Oscar Lopez-Carrera (A-8-20) … defendant is an illegal alien.” The Appellate Division consolidated the cases and reversed. See 464 N.J. … Non-citizens who have lived here for years, gone to school here, raised families here, and established roots in …
-
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Oscar Lopez-Carrera (A-8-20) … defendant is an illegal alien.” The Appellate Division consolidated the cases and reversed. See 464 N.J. … Non-citizens who have lived here for years, gone to school here, raised families here, and established roots in …
-
A-1231-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… GENWORTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. TRISH WALLACE, ACTING … Respondent. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket No. A-001231-23 CIVIL ACTION ON APPEAL FROM A … at the Legislature’s command. The agency claims to not only have authority to regulate insurers pursuant to those …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3469-15T1 STEVE WILSON, … distinguishes this case from Notte v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, 185 N.J. 490, 497 (2006). There, the … amendment, both the common law and LAD claims would both have been time-barred, the relation-back doctrine treated …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3469-15T1 STEVE WILSON, … distinguishes this case from Notte v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, 185 N.J. 490, 497 (2006). There, the … amendment, both the common law and LAD claims would both have been time-barred, the relation-back doctrine treated …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0066-22 IN THE MATTER OF D.Z. … call from a concerned parent of a student at Westwood High School. Corporal Michael Ferrarini responded to the home of … going to kill anyone and D.Z. responded, "[you're] gonna have to find out [I guess]," and "[I]'m not fuckin around." …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … The judge also ordered defendant to enroll K.D. in school by May 5, 2014, four days from the date of the … officers. Public School 38 (PS38) in Jersey City did not have room for K.D. in its kindergarten program, so she was …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … The judge also ordered defendant to enroll K.D. in school by May 5, 2014, four days from the date of the … officers. Public School 38 (PS38) in Jersey City did not have room for K.D. in its kindergarten program, so she was …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0066-22 IN THE MATTER OF D.Z. … call from a concerned parent of a student at Westwood High School. Corporal Michael Ferrarini responded to the home of … going to kill anyone and D.Z. responded, "[you're] gonna have to find out [I guess]," and "[I]'m not fuckin around." …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5061-14T4 CAROLYN APPELL, … him to pay a $5000 deductible for his children's health insurance. We affirm, finding no error by the Family Court … premiums. She told the judge the prior health plan did not have a $5000 deductible and "any plan that does not have …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5061-14T4 CAROLYN APPELL, … him to pay a $5000 deductible for his children's health insurance. We affirm, finding no error by the Family Court … premiums. She told the judge the prior health plan did not have a $5000 deductible and "any plan that does not have …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1192-18 VINCENT LAROSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … the one-year period of limitation under the policy should have been tolled while his internal appeal of the insurance …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1179-17T1 FOUZIA SALIH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … N.J. 196 (2017), the judge explained: [T]he parties here have presented the court with two different …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0959-16T1 IRONSHORE INDEMNITY, INC., … and on the brief). PER CURIAM This is a legal malpractice insurance coverage case. The parties disputed whether the … is well established in this State that an attorney will not have access to insurance coverage to respond to claims from …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0959-16T1 IRONSHORE INDEMNITY, INC., … and on the brief). PER CURIAM This is a legal malpractice insurance coverage case. The parties disputed whether the … is well established in this State that an attorney will not have access to insurance coverage to respond to claims from …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3924-15T3 PETER A. LIQUARI, III, and … Defendant, and PROCURA MANAGEMENT INC., and/or ESURANCE INSURANCE SERVICES, Defendants-Respondents. Submitted … background to lend context to the present dispute. We have previously noted that [t]he requirement that an …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3924-15T3 PETER A. LIQUARI, III, and … Defendant, and PROCURA MANAGEMENT INC., and/or ESURANCE INSURANCE SERVICES, Defendants-Respondents. Submitted … background to lend context to the present dispute. We have previously noted that [t]he requirement that an …
njcourts.gov
… sought to attain. A supporting or less significant provision of the contract is not to be interpreted to conflict … of dealing is the manner by which parties to the contract have previously dealt with each other. Such a course of … by pretending it is the corporate equivalent of the unschooled, average consumer.’”) However, the law is not …