njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4266-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of defendant's parental rights is in June's best … "had no import . . . [or] significance" to the findings supporting the guardianship judgment because his …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4266-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of defendant's parental rights is in June's best … "had no import . . . [or] significance" to the findings supporting the guardianship judgment because his …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4072-16T3 A-4073-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the judge's findings could have been more detailed and supported with specific references to the facts on which the … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4072-16T3 A-4073-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the judge's findings could have been more detailed and supported with specific references to the facts on which the … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments, including that the court should not order a termination of her parental rights absent proof beyond 11 … parent. E.W. did not call witnesses. B.W.'s law guardian supported termination of E.W.'s parental rights. Dr. Wells …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments, including that the court should not order a termination of her parental rights absent proof beyond 11 … parent. E.W. did not call witnesses. B.W.'s law guardian supported termination of E.W.'s parental rights. Dr. Wells …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4032-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … In May 2018, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights followed by … M.I.S. also did not present any testimony or evidence but supported the termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights. Judge …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4032-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … In May 2018, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights followed by … M.I.S. also did not present any testimony or evidence but supported the termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights. Judge …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … begin our discussion with the legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a … harm to them. The father did not provide paternal care or support for the children. Indeed, even though he was allowed …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … begin our discussion with the legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a … harm to them. The father did not provide paternal care or support for the children. Indeed, even though he was allowed …
njcourts.gov
… now or in the past Dating or dated in the past Having a child in common … What relationships are covered by the PDVA? …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2659-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian for the children participated and supported termination of parental rights. 5 A-2659-23 On April 15, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2659-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian for the children participated and supported termination of parental rights. 5 A-2659-23 On April 15, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were terminated in other proceedings. We affirmed those terminations. See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. … trial in 2012 involved Jill, Gary and Carrie. The record supported the trial court's finding that "T.M.T. has chronic …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were terminated in other proceedings. We affirmed those terminations. See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. … trial in 2012 involved Jill, Gary and Carrie. The record supported the trial court's finding that "T.M.T. has chronic …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Prong Three. (4) The Trial Court Erred When It Found That Termination Of Parental Rights Was In The Child's Best … & Fam. Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 451 (2012). Evidence supporting the first prong may also support the second prong …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Prong Three. (4) The Trial Court Erred When It Found That Termination Of Parental Rights Was In The Child's Best … & Fam. Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 451 (2012). Evidence supporting the first prong may also support the second prong …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1321-21 A-1588-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 4 A-1321-21 Division asked N.D. to identify any relative supports and referred her for another psychiatric screening, … and convincing evidence that prong one and prong two of the termination statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, were met as J.D.'s …